Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 9;24(2):e13813. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13813

TABLE 1.

Comparison of targets and organ‐at‐risk (OAR) coverage between scheduled versus adapted plans on adapted or non‐adapted fractions

Median (%) Interquartile range (%) p Value
PTV V 30 Gy adapted
Scheduled 91.2 84.3–93.9 <0.0001
Adapted 95 95–95
PTV V 30 Gy non‐adapted
Scheduled 95.5 94.3–97.1 0.0975
Adapted 95 95–95
CTV V 30 Gy adapted
Scheduled 97.2 93.4–99.2 <0.0001
Adapted 99.6 98.9–99.8
CTV V 30 Gy non‐adapted
Scheduled 99.6 97.1–99.8 0.3056
Adapted 99.7 99.4–99.9
Heart V 150 cGy adapted
Scheduled 0.7 0–8.0 0.3044
Adapted 0.7 0–5.4
Breast V 50% adapted
Scheduled 26.4 22.3–32.1 0.8413
Adapted 27.8 22.2–31.8
Breast V 100% adapted
Scheduled 10 8.1–12.3 0.6789
Adapted 10 8.4–13.0
Lung V 9 Gy adapted
Scheduled 6 3.4–8.2 0.4553
Adapted 5.8 2.5–7.4
Skin D0.03cm3 per fraction, adapted Median (cGy) Interquartile range (cGy)
Scheduled 634 618.8–647.0 0.4915
Adapted 634 619.8–641.0