Table 2. A correlation matrix between overall Eating Attitude Test-26 scores and potential independent variables among patients with feeding and eating disorders (N = 102).

Variables	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9		10	11	12	13	14	15
1. Age	–
2. Gender	−0.05	–
3. MS	0.41***	−0.17	–
4. EL	0.12	0.34	0.12	–
5. Income	0.53***	−0.37	0.49*	0.02	–
6. BMI	−0.17	−0.13	−0.03	−0.05	0.05	–
7. PPS (F)	0.09	0.14	−0.04	−0.04	−0.05	−0.18	–
8. PPS (M)	0.07	0.01	0.04	0.08	−0.07	−0.11	0.19*	–
9. APS (F)	−0.11	0.10	−0.15	−0.00	−0.04	−0.06	−0.20*	0.08	–
10. APS (M)	−0.01	0.09	0.03	0.03	−0.01	−0.00	0.06	−0.15	0.36***		–
11. A/FPS (F)	−0.22*	0.04	−0.05	0.10	−0.22*	0.15	0.04	0.01	−0.13		0.03	–
12. A/FPS (M)	−0.16	0.19	−0.10	0.17	−0.24*	−0.26**	0.14	0.21*	0.06		−0.13	0.14	–
13. OCS	−0.16	0.11	−0.12	0.07	−0.14	0.00	−0.04	−0.09	0.49***		0.46***	−0.06	−0.00	–
14. ACS	−0.14	0.07	−0.10	0.08	−0.04	0.01	−0.03	−0.08	0.50***		0.51***	−0.03	−0.01	0.83***	–
15. EAT-26	−0.14	0.21*	−0.11	0.06	−0.10	0.09	0.05	−0.02	0.53***	0.59***		0.03	0.03	0.76***	0.77***	–

Notes:

Point-biserial correlation coefficient, Pearson’s r, Spearman’s ρ, Gamma, and Cramer’s V were used to examine the correlations between study variables.

ACS, avoidance coping style; A/FPS, authoritative/flexible parenting style; APS, authoritarian parenting style; BMI, body mass index; EAT-26, the 26-item Eating Attitude Test; EL, education level; F, father; M, mother; MS, marital status; OCS, overcompensation coping style; PPS, permissive parenting style.

^*p < 0.05.

^**p < 0.01.

^***p < 0.001.