Table 2.
Fixed Effect Estimates | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Est. | SE | p | 95% CI | |
Adherence | ||||
Analytic Process (AP) | ||||
Intercept | 0.223 | 0.012 | <.001 | [0.199, 0.247] |
Proportion of Session | −0.141 | 0.028 | <.001 | [−0.196, −0.086] |
First Case Discussion | 0.321 | 0.022 | <.001 | [0.278, 0.364] |
Principles (P) | ||||
Intercept | 0.198 | 0.011 | <.001 | [0.176, 0.220] |
Proportion of Session | −0.089 | 0.027 | .001 | [−0.142, −0.036] |
First Case Discussion | 0.391 | 0.024 | <.001 | [0.344, 0.438] |
Competence | ||||
Analytic Process (AP) | ||||
Intercept | 1.969 | 0.014 | <.001 | [1.942, 1.996] |
Proportion of Session | −0.416 | 0.095 | <.001 | [−0.602, −0.230] |
First Case Discussion | 0.462 | 0.027 | <.001 | [0.409, 0.515] |
Principles (P) | ||||
Intercept | 1.985 | 0.013 | <.001 | [1.960, 2.010] |
Proportion of Session | −0.427 | 0.083 | <.001 | [−0.590, −0.264] |
First Case Discussion | 0.472 | 0.026 | <.001 | [0.421, 0.523] |
Structure & Process (SP) | ||||
Intercept | 2.058 | 0.019 | <.001 | [2.021, 2.095] |
Proportion of Session | −0.274 | 0.064 | <.001 | [−0.399, −0.149] |
First Case Discussion | 0.425 | 0.028 | <.001 | [0.370, 0.480] |
Variance Component Estimates | ||||
Est. | SD | p | ||
Adherence | ||||
Analytic Process (AP) | ||||
Session | 0.004 | 0.066 | ||
Supervisor | 0.002 | 0.047 | <.001 | |
Principles (P) | ||||
Session | 0.004 | 0.063 | ||
Supervisor | 0.001 | 0.034 | <.001 | |
Competence | ||||
Analytic Process (AP) | ||||
Session | 0.052 | 0.227 | ||
Supervisor | 0.002 | 0.050 | .060 | |
Principles (P) | ||||
Session | 0.045 | 0.212 | ||
Supervisor | 0.003 | 0.050 | .048 | |
Structure & Process (SP) | ||||
Session | 0.023 | 0.151 | ||
Supervisor | 0.018 | 0.134 | <.001 |
Note. The two-level mixed-effects regression model included a maximum of seven monthly measurements (level-1; N = 374) nested within supervisors (level-2; N = 57). The first case discussion predictor (time-varying) was the Adherence or Competence score from the first case discussion of each session. Each model controlled for the proportion of the full session duration (time-varying) covered by the 15-min segment. The control was grand mean centered, with the resulting intercept reflecting an average proportion.