Table 5.
Mean importance | SD | Count of respondents rated competency very or extremely important, N (%) | |
---|---|---|---|
Design strategies to address the multi-level influences of health inequities as it relates to the implementation of an evidence-based intervention | 4.31 | 0.84 | 100 (84.7) |
Integrate strategies within D&I research to facilitate meaningful stakeholder engagement (e.g., shared power, shared decision-making, co-learning) | 4.27 | 0.78 | 100 (84.7) |
Operationalize hybrid effectiveness-implementation designs when appropriate to accelerate the implementation of evidence-based interventions in real-world settings | 4.14 | 0.87 | 94 (79.7) |
Develop strategies to promote equity in resource distribution across all external research partners, including community partners or other external organizations and the researcher's institution | 4.00 | 0.94 | 80 (67.8) |
Summarize the importance of ethically and culturally competent clinical and community-based research in D&I science | 3.98 | 0.92 | 85 (72.0) |
Develop and assess processes and outcomes that support iterative cycles of implementation and bidirectional flow of information (e.g., learning health systems) | 3.90 | 0.89 | 79 (66.9) |
Characterize process models that support iterative cycles of implementation and adaptation based on learning | 3.75 | 0.99 | 73 (61.9) |
Examine the importance of rapid research to advance D&I science concepts and directions | 3.70 | 1.00 | 65 (55.1) |
Apply theory and strategies from team science to promote team effectiveness in D&I research | 3.47 | 0.95 | 55 (46.6) |
Apply systems science and systems modeling approaches in D&I research | 3.34 | 0.99 | 53 (44.9) |
Note. D&I = dissemination and implementation; SD = standard deviation.