Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 13;18(2):e0281580. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281580

Table 5. Pairwise comparisons of FCZ with AMB.

Treatment Arm KM Proportion CM Negative by week 10 (90% CI) p-value comparing to AMB arm KM Proportion who died by week 10 (90% CI) p-value comparing to AMB arm KM Proportion who died by week 24 (90% CI) p-value comparing to AMB arm
1200mg FCZ 0.45 (0.29, 0.65) 0.002 0.40 (0.25, 0.60) 0.07 0.40 (0.25, 0.60) 0.14
1600mg FCZ 0.56 (0.45, 0.69) 0.06 0.20 (0.12, 0.32) 0.89 0.30 (0.20, 0.43) 0.53
2000mg FCZ 0.60 (0.49, 0.73) 0.02 0.33 (0.23, 0.46) 0.15 0.38 (0.27, 0.51) 0.14
AMB 0.81 (0.71, 0.90) - 0.17 (0.10, 0.29) - 0.24 (0.15, 0.37) -

*All pairwise p-values calculated using the log-rank test