Table 2.
Drug name | Indication | Smoking trait | Minimal P value and tissue typesa | MAGMAb | Referencec |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Putative drug targets that may be repurposed for smoking cessation | |||||
Dextromethorphan | Coughing | CigDay | 3.3 × 10−39 (caudate basal ganglia) | 1.0 × 10−4 | 32,41 |
SmkInit | 9.2 × 10−15 (brain spinal cord cervical C1) | 0.36 | |||
SmkCes | 2.8 × 10−4 (brain spinal cord cervical C1) | 9.2 × 10−9 | |||
Ganaxolone | Seizure disorders (investigated) | CigDay | 1.3 × 10−9 (substantia nigra) | 0.05 | 33 |
SmkInit | 3.5 × 10−3 (cerebellum) | 0.66 | |||
SmkCes | 0.08 (caudate basal ganglia) | 0.02 | |||
Galantamine | Alzheimer’s disease | CigDay | 4.2 × 10−73 (substantia nigra) | 7.7 × 10−14 | 34,42 |
SmkInit | 1.3 × 10−4 (brain spinal cord cervical C1) | 4.3 × 10−3 | |||
SmkCes | 0.020 (cortex) | 3.4 × 10−9 | |||
Clinical drugs identified | |||||
Nicotine | Smoking cessation | CigDay | 4.2 × 10−71 (substantia nigra) | 4.3 × 10−17 | First-line therapy |
SmkInit | 1.3 × 10−5 (hypothalamus) | 0.01 | |||
SmkCes | 0.03 (amygdala) | 5.8 × 10−11 | |||
Varenicline | CigDay | 4.8 × 10−26 (frontal cortex BA9) | 5.6 × 10−6 | First-line therapy | |
SmkInit | 9.2 × 10−15 (brain spinal cord cervical C1) | 5.9 × 10−3 | |||
SmkCes | 2.8×10−4 (brain spinal cord cervical C1) | 8.2 × 10−9 | |||
Bupropion | CigDay | 9.0 × 10−19 (brain spinal cord cervical C1) | 0.62 | First-line therapy | |
SmkInit | 9.2 × 10−15 (brain spinal cord cervical C1) | 0.92 | |||
SmkCes | 2.8 × 10−4 (brain spinal cord cervical C1) | 0.05 | |||
Cytisine | CigDay | 3.9 × 10−132 (frontal cortex BA9) | 5.6 × 10−6 | Second-line therapy | |
SmkInit | 9.2 × 10−15 (brain spinal cord cervical C1) | 5.9 × 10−3 | |||
SmkCes | 2.8 × 10−4 (brain spinal cord cervical C1) | 8.2 × 10−9 | |||
Anxiolytic drugs (butalbital)d | CigDay | 4.8 × 10−132 (frontal cortex BA9) | 1.1 × 10−3 | Second-line therapy | |
SmkInit | 4.9 × 10−5 (cerebellar hemisphere) | 7.3 × 10−3 | |||
SmkCes | 1.1 × 10−3 (caudate basal ganglia) | 0.33 |
Drug enrichment analysis of TESLA results implicates drugs with biological relevance and drugs that are being clinically evaluated. We created gene sets of drug target genes and tested whether these gene sets were enriched with TESLA hits. The most significant TESLA P values for enrichment analysis are shown and, as a comparison and validation, we also show enrichment analysis based on MAGMA for implicated drugs. Full results are available in Supplementary Table 14. All P values are two sided.
aThe minimal P value in 13 brain tissues; significance Bonferroni’s corrected P values that are under 5% threshold and labeled bold.
bMAGMA using the GWAS signals; significant P values after Bonferroni’s correction are labeled bold.
cReferences where the candidate drugs were discussed.
Preliminary clinical/basic evidence/references support the drug repositioning.
dComplete enrichment results for anxiolytic drugs are shown in Supplementary Table 14.