Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 24;40(2):117–134. doi: 10.1007/s40266-022-01001-5

Table 1.

Characteristics of included studies (n = 33)

Study Country Design Setting Time period Source of data Age (years)£ Sex (%F)◊ Number of drugs∆ Population subgroup Method used to identify DDIs Classification of DDIs π Total N N ≥ 65 years† n ≥ 65 years with a DDI† Prevalence estimate [95% CI]
Abubakar et al. (2021) Nigeria Cross-sectional Outpatient Jun–Sep 2016 Medical records 71.1 (±6.1) 50.8 5.4 (±2.3) 2015 AGS Beers criteria® (Potentially) clinically important 244 244 79 32.4% [26.8–38.5]F
Bacic-Vrca et al. (2010) Croatia Cohort Outpatient Mar 2009 Patient interview, pharmacist/physician record 73 (65–95) 70.6 5 (2–12) Arterial hypertension Lexi-interact® (Potentially) clinically important 265 265 240 90.6% [86.4–93.5]F
Bazargan et al. (2018) USA Cross-sectional Community Nov 2015–Feb 2017 Patient interview, drug inventory method 75.2 (±7) 67 7.3 (±3.60) Hypertension 2015 AGS Beers criteria® (Potentially) clinically important 193 193 NR≈
Bogetti-Salazar et al. (2016) Mexico Cross-sectional Outpatient Jan 2007–Jan 2010 Data from the QOL-AD study 80.11 (±8.28) 68.5 5.20 (±3.04) Dementia Micromedex® All 181 181 107 59.1% [51.8–66.0]F
Burato et al. (2021) Italy Cohort Community Jan–Jun 2018 LHA administrative healthcare data 77.0 (±0.9) 56.9 16.1% used ≥ 5 prescription drugs Delphi consensus (Potentially) clinically important 835,247 835,247 220,175 26.4% [26.3–26.5]F
Chen et al. (2020) China Cross-sectional Outpatient Oct 2018–Apr 2019 Questionnaire 42.92 (18–85) 34.7 22.1% had co-medications¥ HIV University of Liverpool HIV Drug Interactions Checker All 1804 163¥ 11¥ 6.7% [3.8–11.8]F
Faught et al. (2018) USA Cohort Community 2008–2010 Medicare claims data NR 61.6 NR Epilepsy MultipleA All 36,912 36,912 14,396 39.0% [38.5–39.5]G
Guthrie et al. (2015) Scotland Cross-sectional Community 1995 and 2010 GP prescribing data 50.1 51.5 17.2% dispensed ≥ 10 drugs in 2010 British National Formulary (Potentially) clinically important 311,811 73,522 25,071 34.1% [33.8–34.4]H
Hanlon et al. (2017) USA Cross-sectional Community 1997–1998 Data from the Health ABC study 73.6 (±2.9) 51.5 1.73 (±2.0) ; 9.2% took ≥ 5 drugs MultipleB (Potentially) clinically important 3055 3055 767 25.1% [23.6–26.7]F
Harasani et al. (2020) Albania Cross-sectional Community Mar–May 2019 Medical records, patient interview 73.5 (8) 43.1 NR* 2019 AGS Beers criteria® (Potentially) clinically important 174 125¥ 1¥ 0.8% [0.1–5.5]F
Hermann et al. (2021) Norway Cross-sectional Community NR Interview, visual inspection, medication list 78 (±3) 54 43% used ≥ 5 drugs Micromedex® (Potentially) clinically important 233 197 107 54.3% [47.3–61.1]F
Jazbar et al. (2018) Slovenia Cohort Outpatient 2015 Pharmacy claims data NR 56.8 7 (4–11) Lexi-interact® (Potentially) clinically important 1,179,803 346,708 105,355 30.4 [30.2–30.5]F
Kerr et al. (2014) Australia Cohort Community Mar 2007–Nov 2009 Data from the ‘Ageing in General Practice’ study NR 58.7 6.1 (±3.0) µ CYP enzyme inhibitor and substrate drugs Flockhart list of CYP450 DDIs (Potentially) clinically important 1045 1045 65 6.2% [4.9–7.9]H
Lopez-Picazo et al. (2010) Spain Cross-sectional Community Mar 2007 Electronic medical record data (OMI-AP) NR 51 NR* Medications database (BOT) of the CGCOF in Spain All 430,525 64,579 18,405 28.5% [28.2–28.8]I
Lopez-Rodriguez et al. (2020) Spain Cross-sectional Community Dec 2016–Jan 2017 Interview with patient's GP 69.7 (±2.7) 55.8 7.4 (±2.4) ; 17.9% prescribed ≥ 10 drugs ChecktheMeds® All 593 589 373 63.3% [59.4–67.1]F
Matos et al. (2020) USA Cohort Community 2017 Pharmacy claims data 75.5 (±10.4) 70.7 NR BPSD Proprietary CDSS (Potentially) clinically important 1190 1071 725 67.7% [64.8–70.4]G
Naples et al. (2016) USA Cohort Community 1998–1999 Data from the Health ABC study 74.6 (±2.9) 51.3 3.2 (±2.7) 20-m gait speed recorded MultipleC (Potentially) clinically important 2402 2402 251 10.4% [9.3–11.7]F
Nikolic et al. (2014) Serbia Cross-sectional Outpatient Nov 2011 Electronic prescription database NR 57.8 4.66 (±2.10)¥ Drug Interaction Facts® (Potentially) clinically important 4467 2022¥ 755¥ 37.3% [35.3–39.5]H
Novaes et al. (2017) Brazil Cross-sectional Community Oct 2014–Mar 2015 Interview, questionnaire 73.80 (±8.019) 64.5 44.6% used ≥ 5 drugs Medscape Drug Interactions Checker All 368 328¥ 240¥ 73.2% [68.1–77.7]F
Patel et al. (2018) USA Cross-sectional Community Oct–Nov 2015 Patient interview NR 62.1 5.7 (±3.3) 2015 AGS Beers criteria® (Potentially) clinically important 703 703 54 7.7% [5.9–9.9]F
Popović et al. (2014) Croatia Cohort Outpatient 2010 Electronic database (Croatian Health Insurance Fund) 77 63.2 All n = 29,418 used ≥ 5 drugs Mimica Matanović and Vlahović-Palčevskii DDI list (Potentially) clinically important 29,418 29,418 NRΩ
Roughead et al. (2010) Australia Cross-sectional Community Jun–Nov 2005 Veterans’ Affairs Pharmacy claims data 78.1 (±10.8) 45 9 (±6) MultipleD (Potentially) clinically important 287,074 287,074 4211 1.5% [1.4–1.5]I
Santos et al. (2019) Brazil Cross-sectional Community Apr 2015–Feb 2016 Pharmacy records 70.2 (±7.8) 61.3 NR* 2015 AGS Beers criteria®; Dumbreck et al. disease-specific DDI list (Potentially) clinically important 408 285¥ 13 (Beers)¥ 4.6% [2.7–7.7]F
79 (Dumbreck)¥ 27.7% [22.8–33.2]F
Secoli et al. (2010) Brazil Cross-sectional Community 2000 Data from the SABE survey study NR 65.5 NR* Micromedex® All 1035 531 288 54.2% [50.0–58.4]G
Sell and Schaefer (2020) Germany Cross-sectional Community Apr 2015 Brown bag medication review 72.0 (±9.1) 51.9 10.7 (±3.7) PI-Doc® classification Unclear 1090 830 447¥ 53.9% [50.5–57.2]F
Skaar et al. (2011) USA Cohort Community 2006 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey data NR 57 8.2 Medicare beneficiaries with a dental visit Malone et al., 2004 DDI list (Potentially) clinically important 14,361,198 14,361,198 490,874 3.4% [3.4–3.4]F
Song et al. (2019) South Korea Cross-sectional Outpatient 2014ø National insurance claims data 59 (±13.2) 67.3 8.0 (±6.7) patients with polypharmacy~ Cancer MultipleE (Potentially) clinically important 118,258 41,697 4923 11.8% [11.5–12.1]H,#
Steinman et al. (2014) USA Cross-sectional Outpatient 2007 National Veterans Affairs data linked with Medicare claims data 75 2 5 (3–8) Lexi-interact® (Potentially) clinically important 462,405 462,405 139,807 30.2 [30.1–30.4]F
Teixeira et al. (2012) Brazil Cross-sectional Community May–Dec 2010 Electronic medical record data 64.1 (±10.6) 65.9 NR* Micromedex® All 827 394 253 64.2% [59.4–68.8]F
Tragni et al. (2013) Italy Cross-sectional Community Jan 2004–Aug 2005 Pharmacy claims data NR 51.2 NR* Micromedex® (Potentially) clinically important 2,115,326 456,852 88,394 19.3% [19.2–19.5]
Trevisan et al. (2019) Italy Cohort Community Feb 2002–Feb 2004 GP databases and records 76 (71–80) 61.1 53.5% used ≥ 3 prescription drugs Mild cognitive impairment INTERcheck® All 342 342 154 45.0% [39.8–50.3]F
Truong et al. (2019) Vietnam Cross-sectional Outpatient Aug 2018 Prescription database 63.4 (±11.3) 64.3 6.8 ± (2.3); 85.7% used ≥ 5 drugs¥ Coronary artery diseases Drugs.com Interactions Checker (Potentially) clinically important 683 314¥ 62¥ 19.7% [15.7–24.5]F
Yazdanshenas et al. (2016) USA Cross-sectional Community 2013 Patient interview, drug inventory method NR 65 NR Drugs.com Interactions Checker Unclear 400 400 211 52.7% [47.8–57.6]F

AGS American Geriatrics Society, BPSD Behavioural and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia and prescribed an atypical antipsychotic, CDSS clinical decision support system, CGCOF General Council of Official Colleges of Pharmacists, CYP cytochrome P450, F female, GP general practitioner, NR not reported, NR* not reported for the ≥ 65 years of age population, n numerator (number aged ≥ 65 years with a DDI), N denominator (sample size, aged ≥65 years)

£Age data for the full study population, presented as mean; mean (± standard deviation); mean (minimum-maximum); median (interquartile range); or median (minimum-maximum)

Data on sex are for the full study population and were extracted directly or estimated from the data reported in the published study

Data on the number of drugs used are reported for the population aged ≥65 years, and are presented as mean; mean (± standard deviation); median (minimum-maximum); or median (interquartile range), unless otherwise stated

Per ANZCTR registry (trial ID ACTRN12607000117415)

øDDI prevalence data for ≥65 years of age population reported in the published study for 2014 only

¥Data provided by corresponding author

µRefers to the cohort of study participants with a potential CYP DDI

~Definition of polypharmacy not provided in this study

πA full description of the DDI classification for each study is included in Appendix 6 of the ESM

A full description of the numerator and denominator for each study is provided in Appendix 7 of the ESM

Almost 23% (43 out of 188 potentially inappropriate medications) of potentially inappropriate medications were due to drugs with potential DDIs

ΩThe total number of drug combinations potentially leading to serious DDIs was 33,321

#9.6% is reported in Table 6 of the published study; however, the corresponding denominator for this % does not reconcile with the data reported in Table 1, see Appendix 7 of the ESM

DDI prevalence data from year 2 of this study were extracted. Hanlon et al., 2017 used the same data source (Health ABC study), but the authors report data from year 1 of the study

AUS Food and Drug Administration-approved package insert as the primary source, supplemented with the literature; Medscape Drug Interactions Checker; as well as consulting lists of interactions from other proprietary services: Micromedex®; Clinical Pharmacology; and Lexicomp®

BLiterature and 2015 AGS Beers criteria®

C2015 AGS Beers criteria®, Mimica Matanovic and Vlahovic-Palcevski protocol DDI list, and other expert panel consensus explicit criteria from the literature

DVidal, British National Formulary, Drug Interaction Facts, and Micromedex® Drug-Reax

EDrug Interaction Facts®, Micromedex®, Lexi-interact®

FDispensing/prescribing pattern for DDI prevalence: all drugs dispensed/prescribed

GDispensing/prescribing pattern for DDI prevalence: concomitant

HDispensing/prescribing pattern for DDI prevalence: co-prescribed

IDispensing/prescribing pattern for DDI prevalence: concurrent

§Tragni et al., 2013 DDI prevalence for concomitantly dispensed/prescribed drugs: n = 120,921 (26.5% [26.3–26.6])