Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 13;6(2):e2255770. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.55770

Table 2. Patient Disposition in the Telemedicine and Telephone Arms.

Patient disposition Intention-to-treat analysis Treatment received analysis Per-protocol analysis
No. (%) P valuea No. (%) P valuea No. (%) P valuea
Assigned telephone (n = 159) Assigned telemedicine (n = 537) Received telephone (n = 445) Received telemedicine (n = 251) Assigned telephone (n = 136) Assigned telemedicine (n = 228)
ED dispositionb
Discharged home 7 (4.4) 44 (8.2) .18 20 (4.5) 31 (12.4) <.001 4 (2.9) 28 (12.3) NA
Admitted locally 3 (1.9) 23 (4.3) 4 (0.90) 22 (8.8) 1 (0.7) 20 (8.8)
Admitted to another hospital 3 (1.9) 17 (3.2) 9 (2.0) 11 (4.4) 3 (2.2) 11 (4.8)
Transferred to UCDCHc 144 (90.6) 451 (84.0) 410 (92.1) 185 (73.7) 127 (93.4) 168 (73.7)
Died 2 (1.3) 2 (0.4) 2 (0.4) 2 (0.8) 1 (0.8) 1 (0.4)
Primary outcome: transferred to the UCDCH
No 15 (9.4) 96 (16.0) .13 35 (7.9) 66 (26.3) <.001 9 (6.6) 60 (26.3) .005
Yes 144 (90.6) 451 (84.0) 410 (92.1) 185 (73.7) 127 (93.4) 168 (73.7)

Abbreviations: ED, emergency department; NA, not applicable; UCDCH, University of California Davis Children’s Hospital.

a

From Pearson χ2 tests adjusted for clustering at the hospital level.

b

Presenting ED.

c

UCDCH PICU, ward, or ED.