Skip to main content
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal logoLink to CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal
letter
. 2002 Jan 22;166(2):168–169.

Assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines

Marc Baltzan 1
PMCID: PMC99266  PMID: 11826936

Clinical guidelines have a more fundamental flaw than those discussed recently in CMAJ.1,2 This flaw was expressed by the pioneer Harvard endocrinologist Fuller Albright. In his introduction to a textbook of medicine popular many years ago, he wrote that medicine can be practised by the rules (read guidelines) and they may help 90% of the time but the other 10% the rules will do more harm than they do good in the 90%.

Guidelines are helpful to those who have knowledge but are dangerous in the hands of those who do not, a group to whom guidelines may give confidence to exceed their knowledge. A physician without knowledge but with guidelines is like a monkey in a tree with a machine gun.

Signature

Marc Baltzan
Nephrologist Saskatoon, Sask.

References

  • 1.Graham ID, Beardall S, Carter AO, Glennie J, Hébert PC, Tetroe JM, et al. What is the quality of drug therapy clinical practice guidelines in Canada? CMAJ 2001;165(2):157-63. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 2.Lewis SJ. Further disquiet on the guidelines front [editorial]. CMAJ 2001;165(2):180-1. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association

RESOURCES