Table 4.
Odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals of diabetic nephropathy according to following DASH diet among subjects
| DASH diet | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | Low | High OR (95% CI) | P value |
| N (case/control) | (72/37) | (33/68) | – |
| DASH score | |||
| Crude model | 1.00 (Ref) | 0.26 (0.14–0.47) | < 0.001 |
| Model 1 | 1.00 (Ref) | 0.20 (0.10–0.38) | < 0.001 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 (Ref) | 0.16 (0.07–0.34) | < 0.001 |
| Vegetables (g/d) | |||
| Crude model | 1.00 (Ref) | 0.27 (0.15–0.48) | < 0.001 |
| Model 1 | 1.00 (Ref) | 0.24 (0.13–0.43) | < 0.001 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 (Ref) | 0.20 (0.10–0.39) | < 0.001 |
| Fruits (g/d) | |||
| Crude model | 1.00 (Ref) | 0.23 (0.13–0.42) | < 0.001 |
| Model 1 | 1.00 (Ref) | 0.17 (0.08–0.32) | < 0.001 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 (Ref) | 0.12 (0.05–0.26) | < 0.001 |
| Nuts and legumes (g/d) | |||
| Crude model | 1.00 (Ref) | 0.17 (0.09–0.32) | < 0.001 |
| Model 1 | 1.00 (Ref) | 0.15 (0.08–0.30) | < 0.001 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 (Ref) | 0.13 (0.06–0.28) | < 0.001 |
| Low-fat dairy | |||
| Crude model | 1.00 (Ref) | 0.36 (0.20–0.63) | < 0.001 |
| Model 1 | 1.00 (Ref) | 0.33 (0.18–0.60) | < 0.001 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 (Ref) | 0.27 (0.14–0.52) | < 0.001 |
| Whole grains (g/d) | |||
| Crude model | 1.00 (Ref) | 0.55 (0.31–0.96) | 0.03 |
| Model 1 | 1.00 (Ref) | 0.58 (0.32–1.14) | 0.06 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 (Ref) | 0.51 (0.27–0.95) | 0.03 |
| Sodium (mg/d) | |||
| Crude model | 1.00 (Ref) | 0.61 (0.32–1.17) | 0.14 |
| Model 1 | 1.00 (Ref) | 0.63 (0.32–1.22) | 0.17 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 (Ref) | 0.77 (0.37–1.57) | 0.47 |
| Red meat (g/d) | |||
| Crude model | 1.00 (Ref) | 1.31 (0.17–0.55) | 0.12 |
| Model 1 | 1.00 (Ref) | 1.27 (0.15–0.50) | < 0.001 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 (Ref) | 1.20 (0.10–0.41) | < 0.001 |
| Sweetened beverages | |||
| Crude model | 1.00 (Ref) | 1.12 (0.65–1.94) | 0.67 |
| Model 1 | 1.00 (Ref) | 1.02 (0.57–1.82) | 0.92 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 (Ref) | 1.15 (0.62–2.15) | 0.64 |
Logistic regression was used. Significant items with a P value ≤ 0.05 are bolded
Data are presented as odds ratio (95% confidence interval)
Lower and higher adherence of median of DASH diet are shown
Model 1: Adjusted for energy intake, age, physical activity, body mass index
Model 2: model 1 + diabetes duration, cardiovascular diseases history, and drug usage (angiotensin receptor blockers; angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, beta-blockers, metformin, sulphonyl urea, and insulin)