Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 14;9:31. doi: 10.1186/s40795-022-00658-w

Table 4.

Association of NEAP and PERAL on the SMI, BMC, SMM among obese and overweight female subjects

Β 95% CI P-value
SMI (%) a
NEAP (mEq/day) Crude -0.04 (-0.094, -0.001) 0.04
M1 -0.04 (-0.096, -0.001) 0.04
M2 -0.05 (-0.097, -0.003) 0.03
PRAL (mEq/day) Crude -0.02 (-0.045, -0.001) 0.04
M1 -0.02 (-0.049, -0.002) 0.03
M2 -0.02 (-0.049, -0.004) 0.02
BMC (kg) a
NEAP (mEq/day) Crude -0.00 (-0.007, 0.004) 0.51
M1 -0.00 (-0.008, 0.003) 0.32
M2 0.00 (-0.007, 0.008) 0.92
PRAL (mEq/day) Crude -0.00 (-0.003, 0.002) 0.60
M1 -0.00 (-0.004, 0.002) 0.49
M2 -0.00 (-0.005, 0.002) 0.48
SMM (kg)a
NEAP (mEq/day) Crude -0.00 (-0.057, 0.046) 0.83
M1 -0.00 (-0.059, 0.046) 0.81
M2 0.00 (-0.08, 0.09) 0.97
PRAL (mEq/day) Crude 0.00 (-0.24, 0.026) 0.93
M1 0.00 (-0.023, 0.28) 0.82
M2 0.00 (-0.017, 0.018) 0.94

M1: Adjusted for age, PA, energy intake

M2: Adjusted for age, PA, energy intake, education, job, marital status, supplementation use, income status and height

Statistical significance was accepted at p < 0.05

aLinear regression; CI confidence interval, PERAL Potential renal acid load, NEAP Net endogenous acid production, SMI Skeletal muscle mass index, BMC Bone mineral content, SMM Skeletal muscle mass