Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 14;21(2):e07744. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7744

Table 2.

KER certainties (probability distribution means and standard deviations)

AOP KER Mean Std
SULT1E1 inhibition KER1: from SULT1E1 inhibition to increased E2 availability in the uterus 0.61 0.06
KER2: from increased E2 availability in the uterus to ER activation 0.75 0.06
Reduced availability of GnRH leading to uterine adenocarcinoma via increased estrogen availability at the target organ level KER1: reduced GnRH availability pulsatory release leads to decrease/delayed LH surge 0.82 0.04
KER2: reduced LH surge leads to delayed ovulation 0.82 0.05
KER3: delayed ovulation leads to estrogen dominance 0.68 0.04
ER activation led to uterine adenocarcinoma via epigenetic modulation KER1: era activation leading to epigenetic modulation 0.4 0.11
KER2: epigenetic modulation leading to altered expression of factors ruling proliferation 0.62 0.1
KER3: expression of factors ruling proliferation leading to an increased proliferation (hyperplasia) 0.84 0.05
KER4: increased proliferation leads to genetic instability (accumulation of mutations) 0.54 0.06
KER5: genetic instability (accumulation of mutations) leads to uterine adenocarcinoma 0.4 0.08