表 1. Comparison of various algorithms based on type Ⅰ CNN model.
基于Ⅰ型CNN模型的各算法对比
| 分类算法 | 心音分类评估标准 | ||||
| se | sp | acc | F1 | AUC | |
| STFT + CNN[5] | 0.876 | 0.896 | 0.886 | 0.885 | 0.939 |
| MFCC + CNN[7] | 0.876 | 0.926 | 0.901 | 0.898 | 0.948 |
| MFSC + CNN[8] | 0.872 | 0.938 | 0.905 | 0.902 | 0.952 |
| 子带包络(128 × 64) + CNN | 0.892 | 0.936 | 0.914 | 0.912 | 0.952 |
| 子带包络(64 × 32) + CNN | 0.912 | 0.938 | 0.925 | 0.924 | 0.965 |
| 子带包络(32 × 16) + CNN | 0.938 | 0.940 | 0.939 | 0.939 | 0.966 |