表 2. Comparison of various algorithms based on type Ⅱ CNN model.
基于Ⅱ型CNN模型的各算法对比
| 分类算法 | 心音分类评估标准 | ||||
| se | sp | acc | F1 | AUC | |
| STFT + CNN[5] | 0.862 | 0.904 | 0.883 | 0.881 | 0.916 |
| MFCC + CNN[7] | 0.884 | 0.874 | 0.879 | 0.880 | 0.914 |
| MFSC + CNN[8] | 0.814 | 0.964 | 0.889 | 0.880 | 0.945 |
| 子带包络(128 × 64) + CNN | 0.884 | 0.936 | 0.910 | 0.908 | 0.962 |
| 子带包络(64 × 32) + CNN | 0.898 | 0.940 | 0.919 | 0.917 | 0.968 |
| 子带包络(32 × 16) + CNN | 0.900 | 0.940 | 0.920 | 0.918 | 0.963 |