Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr;36(2):189–198. [Article in Chinese] doi: 10.7507/1001-5515.201712031

表 1. Comparison of arrhythmia classification results based on MIT-BIH database according to AAMI.

AAMI 标准下 MIT-BIH 数据心律不齐分类结果对比

方法 混合矩阵 评估指标
Nor Sveb Veb Fus Unc Se Sp Acc
DR-CNN Nor 28 820 46 44 19 2 99.62% 96.40% 99.034 9%
Sveb 106 889 1 0 0 89.26% 99.85%
Veb 56 2 2 459 7 0 97.42% 99.79%
Fus 18 0 19 248 0 87.02% 99.92%
Unc 6 0 3 0 1 346 99.34% 99.99%
CNN Nor 28 861 30 34 1 5 99.76% 90.76% 98.281 1%
Sveb 198 796 2 0 0 79.92% 99.89%
Veb 193 7 2 308 13 3 91.44% 99.84%
Fus 77 1 13 194 0 68.07% 99.96%
Unc 9 0 0 0 1 346 99.34% 99.98%
MLP Nor 28 659 121 135 9 7 99.06% 84.92% 96.674 5%
Sveb 467 528 1 0 0 53.01% 99.60%
Veb 149 12 2 352 4 7 93.19% 99.38%
Fus 131 0 49 105 0 36.84% 99.96%
Unc 31 0 11 0 1 313 96.90% 99.96%