Chemisorption regeneration methods comparison80.
| Regeneration method | Adsorption conditions | WC (mg g−1) | SER (kW h t−1) | Stability | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 60 °C | 100 °C | 60 °C | 100 °C | WC reduction/cycle – 60 °C | WC reduction/cycle – 100 °C | ||
| TSA, air purge | 400 ppm CO2, 25 °C | 18 | 23.85 | 1250 | 1778 | ||
| TCSA, N2 purge | 400 ppm CO2, 25 °C | 19 | 24.24 | 1222 | 1750 | 0.18% | |
| TVSA, 25 mbar, air purge | 400 ppm CO2, 25 °C | 22.35 | 24.82 | 7277 | 10 667 | ||
| TVSA, 500 mbar, air purge | 400 ppm CO2, 25 °C | 20.37 | 24.42 | 1916 | 2778 | ||
| TVCSA, 25 mbar, N2 purge | 400 ppm CO2, 25 °C | 22.4 | 24.78 | 7250 | 11 583 | ||
| TVCSA, 500 mbar, N2 purge | 400 ppm CO2, 25 °C | 22.66 | 26.36 | 1722 | 2500 | ||
| TVSA closed, T ramp | 400 ppm CO2, 25 °C | 5.37 | 15.18 | 3250 | 2361 | ||
| TVSA closed | 400 ppm CO2, 25 °C | — | 16.987 | — | 2083 | 0.38% | |
| TVSA, 200 mbar | 400 ppm CO2, 25 °C | 0.26% | 0.6% | ||||