Table 3.
Comparison of average absolute (Aga) and relative genotyping accuracy (Rga) estimates among laboratories (%, mean±SD).
Subject | 2016 AFST |
2018 AFST |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | Rga% | Aga% | n | Rga% | Aga% | |
Government/academy | 8 | 77.25±31.79 | 66.36±27.36 | 11 | 91.78±26.06 | 85.70±28.31 |
Private | 10 | 97.87±2.66 | 92.97±6.62 | 8 | 89.67±17.71 | 89.67±20.34 |
Absolute (Aga) and relative (Rga) values for the short tandem repeats (STRs) included in the International Society for Animal Genetics (ISAG) core panel as well as the Canine Genotypes™ Panel Kit 1.1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) using ISAG’s formula for STR typing comparison tests (https://www.isag.us/docs/Rules_CT.pdf?v2).
Aga% = (total number of expected genotypes − genotyping errors including no genotype reported)/total number of genotypes.
Rga% = (the number of genotypes reported − total number of genotype errors excluding blanks)/the number of genotypes reported.