Table 3.
Relative SD (%) of different approaches in scenario S1.
| p = 10 | p = 400 | p = 1000 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | ||||||
| LM | 6.13 | 6.10 | 6.11 | 6.00 | 8.01 | 7.35 |
| MI-PMM | 7.24 | 7.10 | 11.39 | 11.17 | NA | NA |
| MI-Norm | 6.93 | 6.97 | 3446.20 | 4016.47 | NA | NA |
| MI-Mean | 5.80 | 5.65 | 5.54 | 5.60 | NA | NA |
| LASSO-DB | 6.89 | 6.73 | 6.89 | 6.95 | 7.06 | 6.91 |
| LASSO-PS | 5.81 | 5.62 | 5.48 | 5.48 | 5.77 | 5.51 |
| LASSO-DR | 6.25 | 6.19 | 6.11 | 6.14 | 6.39 | 6.22 |
| SCAD-DB | 6.10 | 6.09 | 6.25 | 6.12 | 6.60 | 6.32 |
| SCAD-PS | 7.10 | 6.74 | 6.46 | 6.40 | 6.67 | 6.21 |
| SCAD-DR | 6.03 | 6.03 | 5.94 | 5.82 | 6.36 | 6.05 |
| RR | 6.00 | 5.95 | 5.51 | 5.55 | 5.78 | 5.54 |
| RT | 6.44 | 6.72 | 6.16 | 6.06 | 6.48 | 6.21 |
| RF | 6.05 | 6.13 | 5.53 | 5.54 | 5.75 | 5.51 |
| XGB | 4.23 | 4.15 | 4.14 | 4.15 | 4.17 | 4.11 |
| DL-1r | 6.60 | 6.61 | 9.51 | 9.19 | 9.53 | 9.63 |
| DL-2r | 6.14 | 5.97 | 6.37 | 6.39 | 6.79 | 6.44 |
| DL-1s | 5.43 | 5.50 | 4.79 | 4.79 | 6.25 | 6.12 |
| DL-2s | 4.94 | 4.66 | 4.52 | 4.52 | 6.66 | 7.10 |