Table 7.
Relative RMSE (%) of different approaches in scenario S2.
| p = 10 | p = 400 | p = 1000 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | ||||||
| LM | 21.96 | 21.36 | 21.81 | 21.84 | 22.65 | 22.34 |
| MI-PMM | 22.64 | 21.49 | 16.11 | 16.68 | NA | NA |
| MI-Norm | 22.70 | 21.95 | 1510.97 | 925.63 | NA | NA |
| MI-Mean | 17.67 | 14.73 | 17.73 | 17.77 | NA | NA |
| LASSO-DB | 20.66 | 20.38 | 18.39 | 18.29 | 17.93 | 18.11 |
| LASSO-PS | 11.53 | 10.51 | 11.91 | 11.90 | 11.95 | 12.27 |
| LASSO-DR | 21.95 | 21.47 | 20.19 | 20.11 | 19.78 | 20.00 |
| SCAD-DB | 21.95 | 21.44 | 20.78 | 20.85 | 20.04 | 20.31 |
| SCAD-PS | 10.60 | 9.87 | 12.06 | 12.00 | 12.17 | 12.53 |
| SCAD-DR | 23.32 | 22.97 | 22.45 | 22.49 | 21.64 | 21.95 |
| RR | 22.01 | 21.47 | 18.61 | 18.67 | 18.44 | 18.62 |
| RT | 16.76 | 17.07 | 14.49 | 15.11 | 12.98 | 13.55 |
| RF | 23.07 | 21.97 | 17.13 | 17.12 | 16.91 | 17.09 |
| XGB | 9.63 | 11.22 | 10.19 | 10.04 | 10.19 | 10.03 |
| DL-1r | 13.95 | 15.68 | 9.08 | 8.45 | 7.33 | 7.87 |
| DL-2r | 11.13 | 10.91 | 7.70 | 7.10 | 6.14 | 6.29 |
| DL-1s | 10.12 | 10.06 | 8.09 | 14.36 | 9.27 | 21.18 |
| DL-2s | 8.47 | 11.78 | 6.97 | 10.83 | 9.73 | 18.68 |