Table 2.
Outcome | b (SE) | p |
---|---|---|
Baseline IL-6 | ||
Total demand/withdraw | 0.003 (0.001) | 0.04a |
Husband demand/wife withdraw | 0.01 (0.003) | 0.01 |
Post-Discussion Negative Emotion | ||
Total demand/withdraw | 0.08 (0.02) | 0.001 |
Wife demand/husband withdraw | 0.10 (0.04) | 0.019 |
Coded negative behavior | 0.08 to 0.09 (0.02) | <0.002 |
Post-Discussion Positive Emotion | ||
Mutual discussion avoidance | −0.68 (0.27) | 0.01 |
Post-Discussion Evaluation | ||
Total demand/withdraw | −0.03 (0.01) | 0.003 |
Wife demand/husband withdraw | −0.04 (0.01) | <0.001 |
Roles in demand/withdraw | −0.03 (0.01) | 0.016 |
Mutual constructive communication | 0.05 (0.02) | 0.003 |
Coded negative behavior | −0.06 to −0.07 (0.01) | <0.001 |
Wound healing (TEWL AUC) | ||
Mutual discussion avoidance | 4.12 (1.96) | 0.037a |
Notes. Only significant effects are shown; all effects are reported in text. Negative behavior coefficent ranges reflect effects across models with each self-reported communication pattern.
This effect remained significant after a Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery rate correction of .15 but not .10.