Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2022 Nov 24;149:105989. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2022.105989

Table 2.

Multilevel Model Coefficients for Significant Communication Patterns and Coded Behaviors Across Immune, Emotional, and Relational Outcomes

Outcome b (SE) p
Baseline IL-6
    Total demand/withdraw 0.003 (0.001) 0.04a
    Husband demand/wife withdraw 0.01 (0.003) 0.01
Post-Discussion Negative Emotion
    Total demand/withdraw 0.08 (0.02) 0.001
    Wife demand/husband withdraw 0.10 (0.04) 0.019
    Coded negative behavior 0.08 to 0.09 (0.02) <0.002
Post-Discussion Positive Emotion
    Mutual discussion avoidance −0.68 (0.27) 0.01
Post-Discussion Evaluation
    Total demand/withdraw −0.03 (0.01) 0.003
    Wife demand/husband withdraw −0.04 (0.01) <0.001
    Roles in demand/withdraw −0.03 (0.01) 0.016
    Mutual constructive communication 0.05 (0.02) 0.003
    Coded negative behavior −0.06 to −0.07 (0.01) <0.001
Wound healing (TEWL AUC)
Mutual discussion avoidance 4.12 (1.96) 0.037a

Notes. Only significant effects are shown; all effects are reported in text. Negative behavior coefficent ranges reflect effects across models with each self-reported communication pattern.

a

This effect remained significant after a Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery rate correction of .15 but not .10.