Table 2.
Posterior summaries of model parameters for C. sinensis infection.
| Variable | Estimated median (95% BCI) | OR (95% BCI) | Prob (%)a |
|---|---|---|---|
| Diagnostic methods (Kato-Katz)b | |||
| FEc | 0.46 (0.28, 0.64)e | 1.59 (1.32, 1.91) | >99.99 |
| Combinedd | 0.73 (0.62, 0.85)e | 2.08 (1.86, 2.33) | >99.99 |
| Human influence index (≤30)b | |||
| 30–50 | −0.22 (−0.43, −0.001)e | 0.80 (0.65, 0.999) | 0.03 |
| ≥50 | −0.42 (−0.71, −0.12)e | 0.66 (0.49, 0.88) | <0.01 |
| Urban extents (Rural)b | |||
| Urban | 0.25 (−0.03, 0.52) | 1.28 (0.97, 1.69) | 0.95 |
| Distance to the nearest open water bodies (km) | −0.22 (−0.33, −0.10)e | 0.80 (0.72, 0.90) | <0.01 |
| Annual precipitation (mm) | −0.37 (−0.53, −0.21)e | 0.69 (0.59, 0.81) | <0.01 |
| Normalized difference vegetation index | 0.14 (0.001, 0.27)e | 1.15 (1.001, 1.31) | 0.97 |
| Range (km) | 54.73 (46.14, 64.36) | – | – |
| Spatial variance () | 6.36 (5.20, 7.75) | – | – |
| Non-spatial variance () | 0.60 (0.48, 0.74) | – | – |
| Temporal correlation coefficient () | 0.08 (−0.06, 0.21) | – | – |
| Variance of beta-likelihood () | 0.02 (0.01, 0.02) | – | – |
| Tuning coefficient () | 0.84 (0.74, 0.96) | – | – |
Posterior probability of OR >1.
In brackets, baseline values are reported.
FE: formalin-ether concentration technique.
Diagnostic method combined with FE and Kato-Katz.
Significant effect identified by not including zero in the 95% Bayesian credible interval (BCI) of posterior distribution of the corresponding coefficient.