Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 15;13:2740. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29927-9

Table 3.

Photocatalytic process parameters, nature of photocatalyts, preparation methods, degradation efficiency, as well as irradiation domain and time.

Photocatalyst Synthesis method CAP degradation efficiency [%] Radiation Refs.
Ag/TiO2 nanoparticles chemical reduction 84 UV light, 120 min 69
Fe(III)-hydroxysulfate/oxalic acid bio-synthesis 97.5 UV to IR, 40 min 70
TiO2 nanoparticles (30% rutile, 70% anatase) commercial 93.8 UV light, 45 min 71
TiO2-H2O2 commercial 99.5 UV light, 180 min 72
B, Ni co-doped TiO2/g-C3N4 sol gel, calcination, and heating reflux method 95 Visible light, 180 min 73
CdS/WO3/FTO photoanode; hemin-graphene cathode—photoelectrocatalysis layer-by-layer assembly of CdS quantum dots on WO3/FTO 80 Visible light, 10 h 74
SrFeO3−x/g-C3N4 sintering 95 Visible light, 24 h 75
CuInS2 hydrothermal technique 50 Visible light, 160 min 76
St-doped La cobaltate/Cl-doped carbon nitride Calcination, sol–gel 20 Visible light, 20 min 77
Fe oxide/Fe hydroxide/N-rGO layers MAPLE laser based method 80% Visible light, 400–700 nm, 16 × 8 W lamps; 1 × 1 cm2 surface area; ~ 10 μg; 360 min Data reported in this work