Table 3.
Photocatalytic process parameters, nature of photocatalyts, preparation methods, degradation efficiency, as well as irradiation domain and time.
| Photocatalyst | Synthesis method | CAP degradation efficiency [%] | Radiation | Refs. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ag/TiO2 nanoparticles | chemical reduction | 84 | UV light, 120 min | 69 |
| Fe(III)-hydroxysulfate/oxalic acid | bio-synthesis | 97.5 | UV to IR, 40 min | 70 |
| TiO2 nanoparticles (30% rutile, 70% anatase) | commercial | 93.8 | UV light, 45 min | 71 |
| TiO2-H2O2 | commercial | 99.5 | UV light, 180 min | 72 |
| B, Ni co-doped TiO2/g-C3N4 | sol gel, calcination, and heating reflux method | 95 | Visible light, 180 min | 73 |
| CdS/WO3/FTO photoanode; hemin-graphene cathode—photoelectrocatalysis | layer-by-layer assembly of CdS quantum dots on WO3/FTO | 80 | Visible light, 10 h | 74 |
| SrFeO3−x/g-C3N4 | sintering | 95 | Visible light, 24 h | 75 |
| CuInS2 | hydrothermal technique | 50 | Visible light, 160 min | 76 |
| St-doped La cobaltate/Cl-doped carbon nitride | Calcination, sol–gel | 20 | Visible light, 20 min | 77 |
| Fe oxide/Fe hydroxide/N-rGO layers | MAPLE laser based method | 80% | Visible light, 400–700 nm, 16 × 8 W lamps; 1 × 1 cm2 surface area; ~ 10 μg; 360 min | Data reported in this work |