Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 27;27(1):60–77. doi: 10.1177/13674935211043680

Table 1.

General characteristics of studies exploring pediatric sibling donors of HSCT.

Author Country Sample size (transplant status) Study design Measures
D’Auria et al. (2015) Canada 8 sibling donors aged 10–30 years (successful) Qualitative, grounded theory Semi-structured, open-ended interviews
Erden et al. (2019) Turkey 30 HSCT recipients; 20 donors aged 6–18 years; 30 nondonors aged 6–18 years Cross-sectional study, descriptive, quantitative Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia (K-SADS)
Children’s Depression Inventory
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory
Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale
Hollingshead-Redlich Scale
Gizli Coban et al. (2017) Turkey 35 mothers and siblings (donor and nondonor) aged 5–18 years;
35 healthy peers aged 5–18 years and mothers
Cross-sectional study, descriptive, quantitative CPTSD-RI
PCL-C (mothers)
PedsQL 4.0
Hoag et al. (2018) USA 9 sibling donors aged 9–21 years (6 successful; 3 unsuccessful) Mixed methods, longitudinal study Semi-structured interview
The Child Behavior Checklist (ages 6–18)
Youth Self-Report (ages 11–18)
Adult Self-Report (age 18–59)
The Ways of Coping Questionnaire
The Network of Relationships Inventory
The Faces of Pain Scale Revised
Hutt et al. (2015) Israel 36 sibling donors median age 13 at time of donation, 50 parents of pediatric patients Cross-sectional, descriptive, quantitative Questionnaires:
Donor’s attitude questionnaire regarding stem cell transplant
Parent’s attitude questionnaire regarding the sibling donor experience
MacLeod et al. (2003) Canada 15 sibling donors aged 7–20 years (8 successful; 7 unsuccessful) Qualitative, grounded theory Interviews
Packman et al. (1997a; 1997b, 1998, 2003, 2004) USA 44 siblings; 21 donors, 23 nondonors aged 6–18 years (all successful) Mixed methods with a cross-sectional description component Semi-structured, forced-choice and open-ended interviews using:
The Revised Children’s Manifest Anxiety Scale
The Child Depression Inventory
The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale
Child Post-Traumatic Stress Reaction Scale;
Kinetic Family Drawing Revised
Human Figure Drawing
Pelletier et al. (2014) USA and Canada 58 parents and surrogates; 19 patients; 16 donor siblings aged 9–17 years; 39 nondonor siblings, half-siblings and cousins Qualitative, exploratory study (semantic content analysis); secondary analysis Semi-structured, open-ended interviews
Pentz et al. (2014) USA and Canada T1= 12 sibling donors
T2= 12 sibling donors
T3= 10 sibling donors aged 9–18 years
Mixed methods, cross-sectional description component Interviews
The Satisfaction with Decision Scale
Decision Regret Scale
Pentz et al. (2012) USA and Canada 15 patients aged 11–18 years; 22 mothers; 2 step-mothers; 1 grandmother; 19 fathers; 3 stepfathers; 1 grandfather; 13 sibling donors aged 9–17 years; nondonor siblings aged 9–22 years Qualitative grounded theory; secondary analysis Qualitative Interviews
Pot-Mees and Zeitlin (1987) England 15 patients; 9 sibling donors; 10 sibling nondonors; 15 mothers; 8 fathers Mixed methods, cross-sectional, pilot study Semi-structured interview
The Richmond BCL
Rutter A Scale
Ruth Griffiths Developmental Scales (younger children)
British Abilities Scales (older children)
General Health Questionnaire (parents)
Stegenga et al. (2019) USA and Canada 47 parents and surrogates; 17 patients; 16 donor siblings; 39 nondonor siblings; half-siblings; cousins Qualitative, exploratory study (semantic content analysis); secondary analysis Semi-structured, open-ended interviews
Switzer et al. (2016) USA 105 pediatric donors:
5–7 years= 19;
8–12 years= 45;
13–18 years= 41
Quantitative, longitudinal The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory
Health Related Quality of Life
Open-ended question (parents)
White et al. (2017) USA and Canada 109 family members
56 parent/surrogates; 18 patients; 24 nondonor siblings; 11 donor siblings; 15 health care providers
Qualitative, exploratory study (semantic content analysis); secondary analysis Semi-structured, open-ended interviews
Wiener et al. (2008) USA 14 sibling donors: 11 siblings living (3 recipients deceased) aged 9–28 years Qualitative, exploratory study (content analysis) Retrospective interviews
Wilkins and Woodgate (2007) Canada 8 siblings: 3 donors; 5 nondonors (all recipients living) aged 11–24 years Qualitative, hermeneutic phenomenology Semi-structured, open-ended interviews
Zajac-Spychala et al. (2020) Poland 45 recipients median age 11.9 at time of donation; 45 sibling donors median age 15.5 at time of donation Mixed methods, cross-sectional Demographic Survey
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) (general)
FACT T01
Adult Siblings Relationship Questionnaire