Table 1.
Variable at time of switch | Unexposed (n = 6154) |
Exposed (n = 794) |
Adjusted Odds Ratioa (95% CI) |
---|---|---|---|
Sex of patients | |||
Female | 3819 (90.9) | 384 (9.14) | ref. |
Male | 2335 (85.1) | 410 (14.9) | 1.94 (1.64, 2.31) |
Age (years) at ART initiation | |||
18–24.9 | 343 (76.9) | 103 (23.1) | 2.50 (1.80, 3.48) |
25–29.9 | 781 (93.4) | 55 (6.58) | 0.54 (0.38, 0.77) |
30–39.9 | 2531 (90.5) | 265 (9.48) | 0.71 (0.56, 0.92) |
40–49.9 | 1776 (87.4) | 256 (12.6) | 0.89 (0.69, 1.15) |
≥50 | 723 (86.3) | 115 (13.7) | ref. |
CD4 count (cells/mm3) at time of switch | |||
<200 | 585 (90.3) | 63 (9.72) | ref. |
200–299 | 823 (87.2) | 121 (12.8) | 1.05 (0.74, 1.49) |
300–399 | 1067 (88.7) | 136 (11.3) | 0.86 (0.61, 1.22) |
400–499 | 1022 (89.3) | 122 (10.7) | 0.76 (0.53, 1.08) |
≥500 | 2657 (88.3) | 352 (11.7) | 0.82 (0.60, 1.14) |
Viral load suppression (<1000 copies/mL) | |||
No | 319 (98.2) | 6 (1.85) | ref. |
Yes | 5819 (88.1) | 788 (11.9) | 6.86 (0.82, 1.27) |
Time (months) on ART at time of switch | |||
0–11.9 | 1159 (92.9) | 89 (7.13) | ref. |
12–23.9 | 917 (86.2) | 147 (13.8) | 2.03 (1.52, 2.70) |
24–35.9 | 771 (88.6) | 99 (11.4) | 1.55 (1.14, 2.13) |
36–47.9 | 643 (89.3) | 77 (10.7) | 1.57 (1.12, 2.20) |
48–59.0 | 686 (90.6) | 71 (9.38) | 2.45 (1.72, 3.48) |
≥60 | 1978 (86.4) | 311 (13.6) | 8.85 (6.48, 12.1) |
Haemoglobin (ug/dL) at time of switch | |||
<10.0 | 261 (94.6) | 15 (5.43) | ref. |
≥10.0 | 5896 (88.3) | 779 (11.7) | 1.44 (0.83, 2.51) |
Body mass Index (kg/m2) at time of switch | |||
<18.5 | 413 (94.3) | 25 (5.71) | ref. |
18.5–24.9 | 2449 (89.6) | 285 (10.4) | 1.67 (1.08, 2.59) |
25–29.9 | 1701 (88.3) | 225 (11.7) | 2.13 (1.36, 3.34) |
30–39.9 | 1591 (86.0) | 259 (14.0) | 3.03 (1.93, 4.76) |
Hypertension at time of switch | |||
No | 5271 (88.8) | 663 (11.2) | ref. |
Yes | 883 (87.1) | 131 (12.9) | 1.02 (0.82, 1.27) |
Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor | |||
emtricitabine | 3322 (94.0) | 213 (6.03) | ref. |
lamivudine | 2832 (83.0) | 581 (17.0) | 8.61 (6.80, 10.9) |
Odds ratios calculated from a logistic regression model; STATA (v. 15.0) psmatch procedure was used to create propensity scores to match patients for analyses of our outcomes.