Table 1.

Peer assessment criteria and results. The total number of trainees that met each criterion is shown (with the number of student/therapist breakdown).

	N (student/therapist)
Device introduction
Excellent	9 (5/4)
1) Explains potential outcomes of using the device
2) Explains how the device works
3) Describes activities the patient will complete while using the device
4) Explains why the device is appropriate for this patient
Clinically Acceptable: Completes 1–3 of the above	3 (1/2)
Not Met: Does not introduce the device to patient	0 (0/0)
Device donning
Excellent	12 (6/6)
1) Checks patient’s skin prior to donning the device to patient’s wrist
2) Appropriately dons the device to patient’s wrist
Clinically Acceptable: Appropriately dons the device to patient’s wrist so that it is not too tight or too loose	0 (0/0)
Not Met: The device is too tight or too loose on patient’s wrist	0 (0/0)
Device set-up
Excellent: Sets up the device swiftly (2–3 min)	12 (6/6)
1) successfully logs into the software
2) Creates patient profile with first and last initials
3) successfully calibrates the device
Clinically Acceptable: Takes too long to complete above tasks (>3 min)	0 (0/0)
Not Met: Did not complete all the above tasks	0 (0/0)
Simulated Treatment Session
Excellent: Therapist constructs activities using the device on the affected hand >75% of session	12 (6/6)
Clinically Acceptable: 50–74% of session	0 (0/0)
Not Met: <50% of session	0 (0/0)
Device doffing
Excellent	11 (6/5)
1) doffs the device and plugs in both the device and the smartphone running the device software
2) Checks skin post session
Clinically Acceptable: Doffs the device and plugs in both the device and smartphone	0 (0/0)
Not Met: Doffs the device but does not plug in both the device & smartphone	1 (0/1)