Table 2. Comparative Study of the Efficiency of Present Catalyst and Other Reported Catalysts for A2 Synthesis.
| sl. no. | catalyst | conditions | time (min) | yield (%) | derivative | catalyst recycle-ability | ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NH4OAc (2 mmol) | H2O, reflux | 57–81 | 80–90 | 17 | (38) | |
| 2 | sulfonated rice husk (60 mg) | solvent-free, 60–80 °C | 60 | 90–98 | 17 | 7 | (39) |
| 4 | nanosized MgO [65 mol %] | EtOH, reflux | 18–29 | 88–91 | 6 | (40) | |
| 5 | n-Fe3O4@TDI@TiO2 [0.028 g] | solvent-free, 70 °C | 14–40 | 82–95 | 22 | 6 | (41) |
| 6 | citric acid/MCM-48 [50 mg] | EtOH, RT | 15 | 92–98 | 11 | 7 | (42) |
| 7 | K2CO3 [5 mol %] | H2O, ultrasound | 12–15 | 85–92 | 7 | (43) | |
| 8 | [H2-DABCO][HSO4]2 (30 mg) | EtOH, stirring, room temperature | 5–15 | 76–99 | 28 | 5 | present work |