Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 16;23:41. doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-02668-9

Table 2.

Comparison of effectiveness of plastic stent and self-expandable metal stent placement in the management of malignant biliary obstruction

Effectiveness of stent placement
Plastic stent (n = 153) SEMS (n = 111) p Value
Technical success rate 98.79% 100% 0.5108
Functional success rate 86.27% 90.09% 0.4553
Mean stent patency 10.28 ± 10.02 22.16 ± 22.23  < 0.001
Effectiveness of stent type
Plastic stent p Value SEMS p Value
Technical success rate
7-Fr (n = 21) 100% 0.6285 Covered (n = 64) 100% 0.9999
10-Fr (n = 72) 97.22% Partially covered (n = 10)  100%
Multiple stenting (n = 60)
100% Uncovered (n = 37)  100%
Functional success rate
7-Fr (n = 21) 85.71% 0.5519 Covered (n = 64) 85.59% 0.2898
10-Fr (n = 72) 83.33% Partially covered (n = 10)  100%
Multiple stenting (n = 60) 90.00%
uncovered (n = 37)  94.59%
Mean stent patency
7-Fr (n = 21) 7.06 0.422 covered (n = 64) 21.35 0.9999
10-Fr (N = 72) 10.56 partially covered (n = 10)  22.53
Multiple stenting (n = 60)
10.88 uncovered (n = 37)  22.8

SEMS self-expandable metal stent