Table 2.
Comparison of effectiveness of plastic stent and self-expandable metal stent placement in the management of malignant biliary obstruction
| Effectiveness of stent placement | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Plastic stent (n = 153) | SEMS (n = 111) | p Value | |
| Technical success rate | 98.79% | 100% | 0.5108 |
| Functional success rate | 86.27% | 90.09% | 0.4553 |
| Mean stent patency | 10.28 ± 10.02 | 22.16 ± 22.23 | < 0.001 |
| Effectiveness of stent type | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plastic stent | p Value | SEMS | p Value | ||
| Technical success rate | |||||
| 7-Fr (n = 21) | 100% | 0.6285 | Covered (n = 64) | 100% | 0.9999 |
| 10-Fr (n = 72) | 97.22% | Partially covered (n = 10) | 100% | ||
| Multiple stenting (n = 60) | |||||
| 100% | Uncovered (n = 37) | 100% | |||
| Functional success rate | |||||
| 7-Fr (n = 21) | 85.71% | 0.5519 | Covered (n = 64) | 85.59% | 0.2898 |
| 10-Fr (n = 72) | 83.33% | Partially covered (n = 10) | 100% | ||
| Multiple stenting (n = 60) | 90.00% | ||||
| uncovered (n = 37) | 94.59% | ||||
| Mean stent patency | |||||
| 7-Fr (n = 21) | 7.06 | 0.422 | covered (n = 64) | 21.35 | 0.9999 |
| 10-Fr (N = 72) | 10.56 | partially covered (n = 10) | 22.53 | ||
| Multiple stenting (n = 60) | |||||
| 10.88 | uncovered (n = 37) | 22.8 | |||
SEMS self-expandable metal stent