Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 24;19(3):1080–1097. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.2c01078

Table 2. Assessment of Surrogate Methods in the Low-Energy Regime Δ ≤ 10 kcal/mola.

  cis
trans
Surrogate MAEInline graphic Av bb-RMSD NLM MAEInline graphic Av bb-RMSD NLM
GAFF AM1-BCC 7.1 ± 3.1 0.48 ± 0.25 10 5.9 ± 4.3 0.41 ± 0.12 15
GAFF HF/6-31G(d) RESP 6.1 ± 7.6 0.29 ± 0.25 10 6.1 ± 4.9 0.35 ± 0.17 29
AMOEBApro13 3.6 ± 4.1 0.36 ± 0.11 23 4.8 ± 4.7 0.27 ± 0.16 49
PM6 3.7 ± 4.6 0.37 ± 0.14 25 4.4 ± 3.4 0.23 ± 0.16 32
PM7 5.5 ± 6.7 0.43 ± 0.18 31 2.6 ± 1.9 0.21 ± 0.06 13
DFTB3-D3(BJ) 6.9 ± 4.7 0.36 ± 0.21 34 6.0 ± 6.7 0.36 ± 0.22 45
B3LYP/6-31G 1.6 ± 2.8 0.16 ± 0.17 30 1.1 ± 0.9 0.13 ± 0.13 35
             
B3LYP/6-31G(d,p), reference     27     21
a

NLM is the number of local minima within the range. Inline graphic in kcal/mol, where Inline graphic and Inline graphic are the respective cis or trans putative GM found over the entire test set. The energies of the surrogate and the reference are compared according to the smallest bb-RMSD match, whose average value and standard deviation are reported in Å.