Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 21;93(2):168–175. doi: 10.2319/052922-394.1

Table 4. .

Correlations Between the Condylar Angular Changes and the Remodeling Parameters and Condylar Head Changesa


Axial Condylar Angle T0-T1 Difference
Sagittal Condylar Angle T0-T1 Difference
Coronal Condylar Angle T0-T1 Difference
Remodeling parameters
 Maximum resorption
  r .071 .010 .09
  P .631 .948 .543
 Maximum apposition
  r .011 .037 −.055
  P .942 .805 .711
 Mean remodeling
  r .071 .021 .039
  P .631 .887 .790
 Mean absolute remodeling (RMS)
  r −.057 .088 −.053
  P .703 .553 .719
Condylar head changes
 Condylar height T0-T1 difference
  r .037 −.092 −.202
  P .803 .536 .168
 Condylar depth T0-T1 difference
  r −.272 −.019 .159
  P .061 .900 .281
 Condylar width T0-T1 difference
  r −.279 −.217 −.104
  P .055 .138 .482
 Condylar volume T0-T1 difference
  r .054 −.098 −.073
  P .718 .509 .620
a 

T0 indicates preoperative period; T1, postoperative period; and RMS, root mean square; r indicates Pearson correlation coefficient.