Table 3.
Association of individual-level demographic and clinical characteristics with outcome of recommending one’s own club type to a friend
Characteristic | Bivariate robust Poisson regression model | Multivariate robust Poisson regression model1 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|||
PR (95% CI) | p value | aPR (95% CI) | p value | |
| ||||
Club type | ||||
Clinic-based | REF | |||
Community-based | 0.92 (0.87–0.97) | 0.004 | 0.92 (0.88–0.97) | 0.003 |
Gender | ||||
Female | REF | |||
Male | 1.0 (0.97–1.1) | 0.321 | 1.0 (0.97–1.1) | 0.361 |
Employment status | ||||
Employed | REF | |||
Unemployed | 1.0 (0.93–1.1) | 0.983 | 1.0 (0.93–1.1) | 0.791 |
Age category | ||||
18–29 years, n (%) | REF | |||
30–44 years, n (%) | 0.99 (0.91–1.1) | 0.772 | 0.99 (0.90–1.1) | 0.829 |
≥ 45 years, n (%) | 1.0 (0.93–1.1) | 0.727 | 1.0 (0.92–1.1) | 0.692 |
CD4 category | ||||
< 350 cells/mm3 | REF | |||
350–499 cells/mm3 | 1.0 (0.95–1.1) | 0.693 | 1.0 (0.9–1.1) | 0.820 |
≥ 500 cells/mm3 | 1.0 (0.97–1.1) | 0.328 | 1.0 (0.97–1.1) | 0.356 |
PR prevalence ratio, aPR adjusted prevalence ratio
Chi square goodness of fit test = 49.9, p 1.00