Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 2;11:1112911. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2023.1112911

TABLE 3.

Comparison the efficiency and recoverability of Fe3O4@PMO/SB-Pd with previous catalysts.

graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2023-1112911_wc_tfx19.jpg
Catalyst Conditions Time Recovery times References
Pd-γ-Fe2O3 Cat. 0.5 mol%, 60°C aceton/H2O, K3PO4 4 h 3 Paul et al. (2018)
Fe3O4@SiO2@mSiO2-Pd Cat. 0.075 mol%, 80°C, isopropyl alcohol, K2CO3 6 h 4 Sharma et al. (2016)
KCC-1-NH2/Pd a Cat. 0.5 mol%, 100°C, K3PO4, EtOH/H2O 4 h 7 Fihri et al. (2012)
Fe3O4@SiO2/isoniazide/Pd Cat. 0.2 mol%, 50°C, EtOH-H2O, K2CO3 30 min 7 Heidari et al. (2017)
Pd@MNP Cat. 0.2 mol%, 60°C, EtOH/H2O, K2CO3 4 h 5 Zhang et al. (2013)
Pd (L8)2 Cat. 0.75 mol%, RT, EtOH/H2O, K2CO3 24 h 5 Neshat et al. (2021)
Starch-Fe3O4@IL-TZ-Pd b Cat. 0.05 mol%, RT, EtOH/H2O, K2CO3 4 h 10 Gholinejad et al. (2021)
Pd@C-dots@Fe3O4 c Cat. 0.22 mol%, RT, EtOH/H2O, K2CO3 2 h 8 Gholinejad et al. (2016)
Fe3O4@PMO/SB-Pd Cat. 0.08 mol%, 50°C, H2O, K2CO3 30 min 11 This work
a

KCC-1, fibrous nano-silica.

b

TZ, triazole.

c

C-dots, carbon quantum nanodots.