Skip to main content
[Preprint]. 2024 Apr 21:2023.02.09.527767. Originally published 2023 Feb 10. [Version 5] doi: 10.1101/2023.02.09.527767

Table 2.

Convergent validity of EAc reactivity to the threat-anticipation and threat-perception paradigms (anatomically defined ROIs; spatially unsmoothed data).

ROI Contrast Aa Contrast Ba Robust β t(207)b Nominal p
BST Threat-Related Faces Threat Anticipation 0.11 1.80 0.07
Uncertain-Threat Anticipation 0.02 0.42 0.68
Certain-Threat Anticipation 0.12 1.68 0.10
Ce Threat-Related Faces Threat Anticipation −0.01 −0.20 0.84
Uncertain-Threat Anticipation −0.10 −1.47 0.14
Certain-Threat Anticipation −0.11 −1.54 0.12
a

Relative to their respective reference conditions.

b

A total of 209 participants provided usable data for both paradigms. Abbreviations—BST, bed nucleus of the stria terminalis; Ce, dorsal amygdala in the region of the central nucleus; EAc, central extended amygdala; ROI, region of interest.