Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 15;25(2):546–553. doi: 10.1093/europace/euac157

Table 2.

Comparison between electrical and mechanical variables in the responder and non-responder subgroups

Responder (n = 39) Non-responder (n = 16) P-value
EF (%) 26 (23–31) 23 (22–28) 0.70
EM coupling (unitless) 0.80 (0.63–0.88) 0.83 (0.60–0.89) 0.94
QRS duration (ms) 155 (140–176) 167 (155–177) 0.11
TST (ms) 50 (20–58) 33 (8–44) 0.04
TLVAT (ms) 81 (73–97) 112 (96–127) <0.01
TST/TLVAT (%) 55 (23–84) 29 (6–43) 0.01
TLVMT (ms) 123 (95–163) 145 (115–161) 0.28
SSI (unitless) 10.7 (7.1–16.8) 4.2 (2.9–5.5) <0.01
Scar (%) 0.0 (0.0–1.2) 8.7 (0.0–19.1) 0.01

Data expressed as median (1st–3rd) quartiles, or expected value (95% confidence interval). Bold values refers to significant p-values (p < 0.05), consistently with the description in the statistical analysis sub-section.

P-value refers to responder vs. non-responder, Mann–Whitney U test.

CI, confidence interval; EF, ejection fraction; EM, electromechanical coupling: Pearson’s R of TD-TPS; TLVAT, total left-ventricular activation time; TLVMT, total left-ventricular mechanical time; TD, time of depolarization; TPS, time-to-peak shortening; TST, transseptal time.