Skip to main content
Frontiers in Pharmacology logoLink to Frontiers in Pharmacology
. 2023 Feb 3;14:1123415. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1123415

Protein arginine methyltransferases in renal development, injury, repair, and fibrosis

Jianjun Yu 1, Chao Yu 1, Georgia Bayliss 2, Shougang Zhuang 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC9935595  PMID: 36817133

Abstract

Protein arginine methyltransferases (PRMTs) methylate a range of histone and non-histone substrates and participate in multiple biological processes by regulating gene transcription and post-translational modifications. To date, most studies on PRMTs have focused on their roles in tumors and in the physiological and pathological conditions of other organs. Emerging evidence indicates that PRMTs are expressed in the kidney and contribute to renal development, injury, repair, and fibrosis. In this review, we summarize the role and the mechanisms of PRMTs in regulating these renal processes and provide a perspective for future clinical applications.

Keywords: protein arginine methyltransferases, methylation, post-translational modifications, renal development, injury, repair, kidney, fibrosis

Introduction

Methylation modification is an essential tool for manipulating gene expression. As the study of epigenetics has progressed in recent years, the importance of methylation modifications in regulating the pathogenesis of various diseases has been acknowledged. Methylation in epigenetic modifications primarily generates epigenetic marks such as DNA methylation, RNA methylation, and histone methylation by reversibly transferring methyl groups in chromatin (Walker and Burggren, 2020). Histone methylation is predominantly found in the arginine and lysine amino acid residues on histone tails and is essential for maintaining histone structure and modulating transcriptional processes.

Arginine methylation is regulated by protein arginine methyltransferases (PRMTs) and protein arginine demethylases. PRMT is a large family of proteins with distinct N-terminal sequences. Depending on the number of transferred methyl groups and the guanidine position of the arginine terminal, PRMTs are categorized into four types, type I (PRMT 1,3,4,6 and 8), type II (PRMT 5 and 9), Type III (PRMT7) and Type IV (PRMT2). PRMTs can cause monomethylation and dimethylation of arginine residues, resulting in the generation of three forms of methylarginine: ω-NG-monomethylarginine (MMA), ω-NG, NG-asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), and ω-NG, N′G-symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA). Type I PRMTs catalyze the production of MMA and ADMA; type II PRMTs catalyze production of MMA and SDMA, and type III (PRMT7) exclusively catalyzes MMA production. Type IV (PRMT2) has only been described in studies with yeast (internal guanidinium methylation) (Nott et al., 2015). Thus, the production of ADMA and SDMA usually indicates the existence of PRMTs. MMA, ADMA, and SDMA in histones are commonly related to transcriptional activation and gene silencing (Mosammaparast and Shi, 2010), and increased circulated ADMA can inhibit NOS (NO synthase), which then inhibits NO (Nitric oxide) production and diminishes endothelial protection (Couto et al., 2020).

Many studies have shown that the PRMT family is also involved in the arginine methylation of non-histone proteins. Many transcription factors, coactivators, and other proteins are subject to methylation (Lee and Stallcup, 2009). In addition to controlling gene expression, PRMTs-mediated methylation participates in a variety of biological processes such as proliferation, differentiation (Adli et al., 2015), transcription (Liu et al., 2020a), variable splicing (Braun et al., 2017), signal transduction (Xu and Richard, 2021), cell cycle (Schneider et al., 2021), and apoptosis (Diao et al., 2019a). PRMTs also affect phenotypic changes and are involved in numerous physiological and pathological processes, such as embryonic development (Vougiouklakis et al., 2017), inflammatory response (Kim et al., 2016), and tumorigenesis (Hwang et al., 2021). As a consequence, the PRMT family has been linked to the development of various diseases and dysfunctions in a multitude of organs, including the heart (Couto et al., 2020), liver (Zhao et al., 2019), lung (Lim et al., 2013), and kidney (Zhang and Zhuang, 2020).

Increasing evidence revealed that PRMTs are closely associated with renal development, acute and chronic renal injury and repair, fibrosis and other renal pathology like renal cell carcinoma (Liu et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2020b), diabetic nephropathy (Park et al., 2017), and renal transplant rejection (Zakrzewicz et al., 2011). In this article, we summarize the role and mechanism of the PRMTs in regulating renal development, injury, repair, and fibrosis and provide some insight for future research and development of PRMT inhibitors and their clinical application.

PRMT activation and their substrates

PRMTs exert their biochemical effects via methylating various histone and non-histone substrates. Additionally, the methylation process of PRMTs seems to be substrate-dependent: different members can methylate the same substrates, and multiple PRMTs can mediate the same substrates (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

The histone methylation site of PRMTs.

PRMTs types Member Histone site Function
PRMT1 H4R3 Transcription activation Nott et al. (2015); Walker and Burggren (2020)
H2AR3, R11, R29 Transcription repression Mosammaparast and Shi (2010)
PRMT2 H3R8 Transcriptional activation Couto et al. (2020)
H4 Transcription activation Lee and Stallcup (2009)
PRMT3 H4R3 Transcriptional activation Adli et al. (2015)
PRMT4/CARM1 H3R2 Transcriptional activation Liu et al. (2020a)
H3R17, R26 Paternal genome reprogramming Braun et al. (2017)
Embryo development Xu and Richard (2021)
H3R42 Transcriptional activation Schneider et al. (2021)
PRMT6 H2AR3, R29 Transcription repression Mosammaparast and Shi (2010)
H3R2 Transcriptional activation Diao et al. (2019a)
H3R42 Transcriptional activation Schneider et al. (2021)
H4 Unknown
PRMT8 H4 Unknown
PRMT5 H2AR3 transcriptional repression Vougiouklakis et al. (2017)
H3R2 maintain euchromatin Kim et al. (2016)
H3R8 Transcription repression Hwang et al. (2021)
H4R3 Transcription repression Hwang et al. (2021)
PRMT7 H2AR3 Derepress DNA repair Zhao et al. (2019)
H3R2 maintain euchromatin Kim et al. (2016)
H4R3 Transcription repression Lim et al. (2013)
H2BR29, R31, R33 stabilizes nucleosome structure Zhang and Zhuang (2020)
H4R17 Promote spermatogenesis Lim et al. (2013)
H4R19 Unknown

Type I PRMTs are broadly expressed in mammalian tissues and organs, with particular spatial and temporal expression (Wu et al., 2021). Further subcellular localization showed that the methylation substrates of type I PRMTs aggregate in the cell membrane, cytoplasm, and nucleus, indicating that Type I PRMTs can function in diverse organelles. Physiologically, Type I PRMTs play a regulatory role in the development, aging, and regulation of the body’s internal environment by methylating histones and non-histone substrates. The histone substrates are primarily concentrated in histones H3 and H4 (Tewary et al., 2019). For example, PRMT1 (Chen et al., 2019), PRMT3 (Lei et al., 2022), and PRMT8 (Dong et al., 2021) can induce methylation of H4R3 and modulates transcriptional activity. PRMT6 is the primary enzyme responsible for H3R2. By competing for H3K4me3, H3R2me2a can inhibit the gene transcriptional activity (Guccione et al., 2007). Furthermore, PRMT2 and PRMT4 catalyze the methylation of arginine 8 (H3R8me2a) on histone H3 and affect normal and abnormal cell cycle progression (Dong et al., 2018; Hu et al., 2020). PRMT4 appears to prioritize methylation of histone H3R2, R17, and R26 (30), and this methylation is involved in regulating numerous biological responses, including embryonic development (Hatanaka et al., 2017; Yang et al., 2019), transcriptional activation (Yu et al., 2020), chromatin remodeling (Dacwag et al., 2009), cell regeneration (Sarker et al., 2019), and cellular autophagy (Yu et al., 2020).

PRMT5 is a well-studied type II PRMT. It is abundantly expressed in the cytoplasm and nucleus of the lungs, liver, heart, kidneys, and other tissues (Wu et al., 2021). Except for H2B, all histones (but mainly H2R3, H3R2, H3R8, and H4R3) are the substrates of PRMT5. The primary function of PRMT5 is to repress gene transcription (Fabbrizio et al., 2002) and to regulate cell proliferation, pluripotency, and differentiation. For example, PRMT5 can inhibit mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) development into osteoblasts by reducing the enrichment of H3R8me2s and H4R3me2s in the promoter region (Kota et al., 2018).

PRMT7 is the representative enzyme of type III PRMTs and the sole isoform of PRMTs that can catalyze arginine monomethylation. PRMT7 is mainly expressed in the lung (Cheng et al., 2018), brain tissue (Lee et al., 2019), breast (Liu et al., 2020c), and other tissues with subcellular localization in the cytoplasm. PRMT7 can bind all known nucleosome histones (Zurita-Lopez et al., 2012). H2BR29, R31, R33, H4R17, and R19 were all methylation sites of PRMT7 (Feng et al., 2013). PRMT7 is also engaged in a variety of biological processes, including DNA damage repair, variable shearing, cell proliferation, and male reproduction (Wang et al., 2021). For example, the H4R19me has an imprinting function in the development of male embryos (Jelinic et al., 2006). In addition, PRMT7 may bind to arginine residues in an alkaline environment and is associated with RNA splicing variability and cancer cell proliferation (Li et al., 2021).

PRMTs in renal development

The kidney goes through a complicated development process originating in the intermediate mesoderm (IM). It proceeds through three stages: the pronephros (E8 in mice), the mesonephros (E9 in mice), and the metanephros (E10.5 in mice) (Dressler, 2009; Reidy and Rosenblum, 2009). The pronephros and mesonephros are transient organs that degrade throughout embryonic development, whereas the metanephros matures into a permanent kidney (Schedl and Hastie, 2000). At the end of the mesonephros, the ureteral bud (UB) extends from the terminal portion of the mesonephric tubules and continues into the metanephric mesenchyme. And the UB and the metanephric mesenchyme (MM) mutually stimulate the production of cap mesenchyme (CP) and renal vesicles (RV) (Little et al., 2007). Subsequently, these structures further produce functional cells, such as nephrons (including glomerular, proximal tubular, and distal tubular epithelial), vasculature (Lopez and Gomez, 2011), interstitial cells, mesangial cells, and pericytes in the kidney (Kobayashi et al., 2014), as well as a complete urinary tubule system.

Growing evidence suggests that PRMT activation is closely linked to kidney development. According to an analysis of total proteome mass spectrometry study, PRMT1, 4, and 5 are expressed in embryonic kidney tissue (Kim et al., 2014; Stopa et al., 2015). While PRMT4 is active only in early fetal development, the expression of PRMT1 and 5 is still detectable at 6 months (Hong et al., 2012). Thus, PRMT1 and PRMT5 may be essential in kidney development and maintenance. Different expression patterns of PRMTs in developmental stages of the kidney imply that they may play different roles in various developmental stages. The roles of PRMT members in kidney development are summarized in Table 2.

TABLE 2.

The role of PRMTs in renal development.

PRMT numbers Histone modification Functions and mechanisms References
CARM1 H3R2me2a Involved in differentiation of early nephrons and CP, immature kidney and collecting duct by methylation of NICD Liu et al. (2015), Liu et al. (2020b)
H3R17me2a Participate in the differentiation of the cap mesenchyme in its early nephrogenesis collaborating with SIX2 Liu et al. (2015), Liu et al. (2020b)
PRMT5 H3R8me2s Engage in UB development through E-cadherin together with SIX2 Liu et al. (2015)
PRMT6 H3R2me2a Co-expressed with Pax2 methylation at early stages of kidney development; Engaged in the regulation of the entire metanephros Liu et al. (2015), Park et al. (2017)

CP, cap mesenchyme; NICD, notch intracellular domain; PRMT, protein arginine methyltransferase; UB, ureteric bud.

H3 histone markers for arginine methylation are highly expressed during the development of the metanephros. H3R2me2 and H3R17me2 markers were significantly expressed in cap mesenchyme, H3R2me2 and H3R8me2 were highly expressed in immature kidney and collecting duct, and H3R8me2 was substantially expressed in immature nephron (McLaughlin et al., 2014). However, it is currently uncertain which PRMT is responsible for inducing the methylation of H3 histones. It has been reported that H3R2me2 and H3R17me2 are co-located with Pax2 and Six2 in the CP, whereas H3R8me2 is co-located with Pax2 and E-cadherin in the UB structure, according to in situ section immunofluorescence analysis. In general, PRMT4 catalyzes the formation of H3R2me2a and H3R17me2a, PRMT5 catalyzes the formation of H3R2me2s and H3R8me2s, and PRMT6 can only create H3R2me2a. As such, it is speculated that PRMT4 may play a role in the development of CP by methylating H3R2 and H3R17, PRMT5 may be required for the development of UB by producing H3R8me2s, and PRMT6 plays a crucial part in the development of the whole early kidney by methylating H3R2. In most organisms, the Notch pathway plays a significant role in early embryonic development and stem cell differentiation (Andersson et al., 2011). Previous research has demonstrated that Notch pathway proteins are engaged in promoting epithelial nephrons (Lin et al., 2014), mesangial cells (Boyle et al., 2014), and renal vascular systems (Mohamed and Sequeira-Lopez, 2019) during renal development. Coincidentally, the production of the Notch intracellular domain (NICD) happens to be the non-histone substrate of PRMT4 (Hein et al., 2015). Thus, PRMT4 may be engaged in early nephron cap mesenchymal differentiation by producing methylation markers in the Arg-2, Arg-17 of histone H3, and the C-terminal of NICD, which is correlated to podocytes, mesangial cells, and angiogenesis.

Furthermore, a crosstalk between arginine methylation and lysine methylation modifications allows for fine-tuning of the kidney development process. Immunofluorescence staining demonstrated that histone H3K4me3 is abundant in CP and nascent nephrons (McLaughlin et al., 2014). In addition, the presence of H3R2me2a in the mammalian promoters is consistent with that of H3K4me3 (Guccione et al., 2007), and H3R2 methylation and H3K4 methylation are mutually antagonistic, as PRMT6-mediated H3R2me2a blocks H3K4me3 mediated by the ASH2/WDR5/MLL family methyltransferase complex at the tail end of histone H3. Further investigations have revealed that H3Rme2 and Pax2 are co-expressed throughout the early stages of kidney development (McLaughlin et al., 2014) and that the increase in H3K4me3 is closely associated with Pax2 gene deletion. Consequently, PRMT6 may be involved in regulating the whole metanephros (including the renal tube, nephron, renal interstitium, and so on), albeit the specific mechanism remains to be further investigated.

PRMTs in renal injury

The role of PRMTs in acute kidney injury

Acute kidney injury is defined by a sudden fall in the glomerular filtration rate and a decline in urine volume. Ischemia, toxins, sepsis, and renal obstruction are major causes of acute kidney damage (Tang and Zhuang, 2015). The primary pathophysiological changes in AKI are apoptosis and necrosis of renal tubular epithelial and endothelial cells. Recent studies have shown that PRMTs are also involved in the pathogenesis of AKI from varied causes. Renal PRMT5 expression rose 12 h after renal ischemia and remained elevated at 24 h (Diao et al., 2019b), whereas renal PRMT1 expression levels were not significantly altered following ischemia reperfusion (IR) (Nakayama et al., 2014). Immunostaining showed that PRMT5 was mainly expressed in epithelial cells of proximal tubules in the renal cortex. This was further verified in cultured HK cells, a human proximal tubular cell line, in which hypoxia/reoxygenation induced expression of PRMT5. PRMT5 upregulation was accompanied by inflammasome formation. Inflammasomes mediate the generation and release of pro-inflammatory substances such as mature interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and eventually cause pyroptosis (Tavakoli Dargani and Singla, 2019). Inhibiting PRMT5 with EPZ (a selective inhibitor) or siRNA can increase the Nrf2/HO-1 signal pathway, minimize ROS-induced apoptosis and inflammation, decrease renal injury, and accelerate tubular cell proliferation. These results suggest that PRMT5 activation contributes to the pathogenesis of AKI and inadequate generation of renal tubular epithelial cells during recovery. Nevertheless, the role of PRMT5 in AKI needs to be verified by using PRMT5 knockout mice.

ADMA expression appears to have a strong influence on oxidative stress in AKI. ADMA and SDMA levels increased in the ischemia/reperfusion model of the rat kidney due to a pathological shortage of L-arginine (Betz et al., 2013). ADMA accumulation and high expression of PRMT1 in the kidney are consistent with renal capillary loss and tubular cell necrosis (Nakayama et al., 2014). ADMA suppresses the generation of eNOS and NO and promotes renal function deterioration. It is speculated that ADMA production may be mediated by other PRMT members rather than PRMT1 since PRMT1 is not significantly elevated in the early stage of AKI. Although PRMT1 was not significantly increased in the IR model, PRMT1 expression was considerably upregulated in acute liver injury (Zhao et al., 2019) and acute lung injury (Lim et al., 2013), strongly related to oxidative stress-induced apoptosis. Thus, PRMT1 expression may be time and tissue/organ-dependent. Currently, studies on PRMTs in AKI are only limited to IR injury models; other models (e.g., nephrotoxic drug models, sepsis models, rhabdomyolysis models, etc.) should be used to demonstrate their roles in AKI.

The role of PRMTs in chronic kidney disease

Multiple systemic disorders like diabetes and hypertension might result in permanent kidney impairment—chronic kidney disease. In contrast to AKI, persistent kidney injury causes more implicated pathophysiological responses as it becomes chronic kidney disease. It triggers capillary loss due to pericyte shedding, immune-inflammatory cell infiltration, interstitial fibrosis, mesangial cell apoptosis, etc., (Sato et al., 2020; Tanemoto and Mimura, 2022). Some members of the PRMT family are also involved in this process. It has been reported that high PRMT7 expression was associated with a lower risk of persistent kidney injury caused by antibiotics (Zheng et al., 2005), and PRMT1 expression was upregulated in renal epithelial cells of DN mice (Chen et al., 2019) as well as in podocytes of patients with DN (Zhu, 2018). Furthermore, the elevation of ADMA was positively associated with the degree of chronic kidney injury in a rat chronic kidney model (Ueda et al., 2009).

Long-term hypertension is also linked to persistent renal injury and chronic kidney disease (Whelton et al., 2017), Upregulation of PRMT1 and PRMT3 in the kidney, as well as downregulation of DDAH expression, were shown to be associated with an increase in ADMA in the rat 5/6 nephrectomy model, exacerbating chronic kidney injury by damage to vascular endothelium (Matsuguma et al., 2006). According to Okubo et al., increased expression of ADMA might enhance vascular endothelial dysfunction by downregulating NO in a canine model of sustained kidney injury. This shift could be mitigated by treatment with adenosine dialdehyde (a PRMT inhibitor) (Okubo et al., 2005). Although type I PRMTs are known to produce ADMA, the precise PRMT members and the mechanism of ADMA-induced damage of the vascular endothelium have yet to be reported.

High lipid-induced PRMT1 expression may also be associated with persistent renal injury. Hyperglycemia and hyperlipidemia are important causative factors of diabetic kidney injury (Hung et al., 2021). Excessive hyperglycemia can activate protein kinase RNA-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK) and transcription factor 6 (ATF6) by upregulating H4R3me2a, promoting EMT and ER stress, accelerating PTEC apoptosis, and aggravating renal fibrosis by upregulating PRMT1 expression (Chen et al., 2019). In another report, high, lipid-induced PRMT1 expression was also demonstrated to mediate apoptosis in mesangial cells via the PERK and ATF6 pathways (Park et al., 2017), and inhibition of PRMT1 expression can delay the progression of diabetic nephropathy by suppressing the AGE-RAGE-mediated rise in ADMA (Leiper, 2005). Furthermore, PRMT1 expression was elevated in the renal cortex in a 5/6 nephrectomy rat model, which was consistent with overexpression of nNOS and ADMA accumulation; NO synthesis may be affected by nNOS-α and nNOS-β, which may exacerbate renal damage and promote progression of CKD (Tain et al., 2011). As a result, further mechanistic studies are needed to clarify the role and mechanism of PRMTs in persistent renal injury.

PRMTs in repair

The kidney has a remarkable but limited ability to repair and regenerate. Following kidney injury, the self-protection mechanism is quickly initiated. When the kidney is injured slightly, surviving proximal tubular cells can undergo dedifferentiation, redifferentiation, self-proliferation, and repair (Guo et al., 2019). Endothelial cells regenerate, and kidney function maintains. However, when kidney was injured severely or persistent (e.g., chronic ischemia or hypoxia), tubular cells would experience cellular necrosis and apoptosis, partial epithelial mesenchymal-transition (EMT), and G2/M cell cycle arrest, capillaries are shed, renal interstitial fibrosis develops (Kumar, 2018).

PRMT5 is closely connected to kidney recovery following an acute injury Braun et al. (2004). Found that PRMT5 expression in the renal tubular epithelium was increased within 24 h and remained high after peaking in an in vitro IR model in mice. According to immunohistochemistry, PRMT5 was significantly expressed in the proximal tubular epithelium in the kidney’s inner cortical and outer medullary sections. In vitro experiments of tubule formation, PRMT5 was also increased in human proximal tubule cells that differentiated into tubule-like structures in the Matrigel matrix (Braun et al., 2004), suggesting the importance of PRMT5 in facilitating the renal repair and tubular regeneration after renal injury. Apart from tubular epithelial cells, PRMT5 expression is also enhanced in endothelial cells in zebrafish models (Quillien et al., 2021), and implicated in angiogenesis by regulating the transcription of ETS transcription factors and adhesion proteins in endothelial cells. Thus, it’s worth investigating whether PRMT5 plays a role in vascular repair after kidney injury. Currently, the possible mechanisms of PRMT5 in renal tubular regeneration have yet to be studied and need to be studied.

After a persistent renal injury, PRMT1 was increased in both kidneys of rats, which was associated with higher ADMA in plasma and kidneys in a 2K1C (two-kidney, one-clip) model. In contrast, nebivolol decreased the expression of PRMT1, ADMA, and DDAH2 and lessened renal fibrosis and capillary damage, and improved renal function; the exact mechanism is not known (Wang et al., 2018). In another study, the pharmacological reduction of ADMA improved endothelial function and reduced ischemic injury in the kidney (Lee et al., 2021). Given that NO is a vasoprotective factor and able to induce dilation of vascular smooth muscle, the ADMA-NO axis may help prevent kidney failure by enhancing endothelial repair.

PRMTs in fibrosis

A growing body of evidence shows that PRMTs play an important role in the myofibroblast activation and progression of renal fibrosis via mechanisms involving microvascular oxidative stress, EMT, ECM (extracellular matrix) deposition, and inflammatory response (Liu, 2011).

Our recent studies showed that expression levels of PRMT1 and its methylation marker, H4R3Me2a, were increased in the kidney following UUO injury (Zhu et al., 2020). Administration of AMI-1, a selective inhibitor of PRMT1, inhibited expression of PRMT1 and H4R3Me2a, attenuated extracellular matrix protein deposition, and inhibited renal fibroblast activation and proliferation in the injured kidneys. In line with these observations, treatment with AMI-1 or siRNA, specifically silencing of PRMT1, also suppressed TGF β1-induced expression of α-SMA and collagen I in cultured renal interstitial fibroblasts, which corresponded to decreased expression of PRMT1 and H4R3me2a. Furthermore, PRMT1 inhibition suppressed activation of the TGF-β/Smad3 signaling in vivo and in vitro. These data suggest that PRMT1 activation contributes to renal fibrogenesis in the model of obstructive nephropathy. In support of this study (Chen et al., 2019), demonstrated that PRMT1 induces ER stress and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in renal tubular epithelial cells and contributes to diabetic nephropathy. One of the critical findings in this study is that overexpression of PRMT1 in HK2 cells exposed to high glucose medium resulted in decreased expression of E-cadherin and β-catenin (epithelial markers) and increased expression of ZEB-1, fibronectin, and α-SMA (mesenchymal markers), whereas the downregulation of PRMT1 had the opposite results (Chen et al., 2019). In addition, the profibrotic role of PRMT1 was also observed in lung and liver tissue (Zakrzewicz et al., 2015). Observed that expression of PRMT1 was increased in IPF (idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis) lung fibroblasts and IPF lungs and in lungs of bleomycin-treated mice, and PRMT1 knockdown or inhibition of PRMT activity reduced IPF fibroblast motility (Yan et al., 2022). Found that the expression of PRMT1 was elevated in cirrhotic livers from human patients and in fibrotic livers of the mouse models, and the application of a selective inhibitor of PRMT1, PT1001B, or hepatic stellate cells (HSC)-specific PRMT1 knockout attenuated HSC activation and liver fibrosis in fibrotic models.

In contrast to the profibrotic role of PRMTs observed in above studies (Wu et al., 2019), demonstrated that inhibition of PRMT1 with PT1001B exacerbated the fibrotic injury in the kidney of mice following UUO and promoted expression of profibrotic proteins in cultured renal fibroblasts. The discrepancy between the results obtained from these studies remains unclear. Recently, the work from the same group also suggests that PRMT3 exerts an anti-fibrotic effect in the kidney, as illustrated by elevated PRMT3 in the kidney of mice subjected to either UUO or FA (Wang et al., 2022); either homozygous or heterozygous deletion of the Prmt3 gene increased expression levels of α-SMA and collagen I in injured kidneys.

In summary, the role of PRMTs in renal fibrosis is still controversial. Further research using knockout mice and more specific inhibitors is needed to clarify their roles in this pathological process.

Conclusion and perspectives

There is mounting evidence that PRMTs play an important role in kidney development, damage, repair, and fibrosis (Figure 1). They are also linked to oxidative stress, cell necrosis, apoptosis, cell cycle arrest, EMT, and immune-inflammatory response. However, the research on PRMTs in kidney diseases is still relatively limited. Currently, most studies are only focused on PRMT1 and PRMT5, with few studies on other members (Table 3). The types and quantities of PRMT inhibitors are limited and lack selectivity; genetic techniques for overexpression or silencing (e. g., knockout mice and transfected cells) are lacking. As a result, not only further experimental research on the specific mechanisms of different PRMTs in various renal disease models needs to be carried out, but also further work is required to develop more effective and specific PRMT inhibitors.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Mechanism of PRMTs-mediated renal injury, repair and renal fibrosis. After a minor injury, the kidney can repair itself (complete repair); however, when severe injury or injury persists, the self-repair mechanism of the kidney cannot resist the external damage, it will tend to develop fibrosis (incomplete repair). PRMTs are widely involved in the process of kidney injury, repair and fibrosis. PRMT1 and ADMA/SDMA are involved in acute and chronic kidney injury, repair and fibrosis. PRMT5 mainly plays a role in acute kidney injury and repair, and PRMT7 is currently described only in the repair process.

TABLE 3.

The role of PRMTs in renal injury, repair and fibrosis.

Pathological processes Targets Models Functions and mechanisms References
AKI PRMT5 HK-2cells; I/R induced AKI Downregulate Nrf2/HO-1; Increases ROS-induced apoptosis and inflammation; Inhibit tubule cell proliferation Zakrzewicz et al. (2011)
PRMT1,ADMA I/R induced AKI Suppress the production of eNOS and NO, Resulte in necrosis of renal capillaries and tubular cells Tewary et al. (2019), Wu et al. (2021)
CKI(DN) PRMT1 rat mesangial cell line Mediate lipotoxicity-induced apoptosis in mesangial cell; Activate ER stress Chen et al. (2019)
PRMT1 PTEC cell line, HK2 cells Induce ER stress and apoptosis through activating PERK and ATF6; Activate EMT activation; Alleviate both tissue injury and renal fibrosis Wu et al. (2021)
CKI(Hypertension) ADMA 5/6Nx Reduce NO production Lei et al. (2022)
Enhance vascular endothelial dysfunction
Repair PRMT5 RPTEC; IRI Enhance the proliferation of tubular cells Dong et al. (2021)
PRMT1 2K1C rat model Prohibit NCK production of ROS and ADMA by suppressing PRMT1 expression to protect the kidney Guccione et al. (2007)
ADMA I/R Model with SD rats Promote endothelial function recovery and decrease renal inflammatory response by suppressing DDAH Hu et al. (2020)
Fibrosis PRMT1 NRK-49F and HK2 cells; UUO Reduce H4R3me2a expression, Decrease ADMA production, increase NO, and promote renal fibrosis through blockade of PRMT1 Dong et al. (2018)
PRMT1 UUO Downregulate DDAH, increased ADMA and reduced renal fibrosis via blocking PRMT1 Qi et al. (2002)
PRMT1 UUO; NRK-49F cells Reduce renal fibroblast activation by downregulating TGF-β/Smad3 pathway to attenuate renal fibrosis with inhibitating PRMT1 Yang et al. (2019)
PRMT3 UUO, FA Increase H4R3me2a expression Hatanaka et al. (2017)

2K1C, two-kidney, one-clip rat model; ADMA, asymmetric dimethylarginine; AKI, acute kidney injury; ATF6, activating transcription factor 6; BTG1, B-cell translocation gene 1; ccRCC, clear cell renal cell carcinoma; DDAH, dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase; DN, diabetic nephropathy; EMT, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition; eNOS, endothelial nitric oxide synthase; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; H4R3me2a, histone H4 arginine 3 asymmetric demethylation; HK2, human kidney 2; IRI, renal ischemia with reperfusion injuries; I/R, ischemia/reperfusion; NCK, non-clipped kidney; Nrf2/HO-1, NF-E2-related factor/heme oxygenase-1; NO, nitric oxide; NRK-49F, normal rat kidney 49F cells; Nx, 5/6 nephrectomy; PERK, protein kinase RNA-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase; PRMTs, Protein arginine methyltransferases; ROS, reactive oxygen species; RPTEC, human renal proximal tubule epithelial cells; SD, Sprague-Dawley; SREBP1, sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1; TGF-β1, transforming growth factor; UUO, unilateral ureter ligation.

So far, there have been few specific investigations on the substrates of arginine methylation in the kidney. Therefore, further digging into the histone methylation sites and substrates correlated to kidney illness is also required. Given the prevalence of crosstalk between HKMTs and PRMTs, as well as between PRMTs’ family members, understanding those interactions and exact methylation sites will help us better understand disease pathogenesis and provide a theoretical framework for the development of specific targeted inhibitors.

Funding Statement

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China grants (82070700 and 81830021 to SZ), and United States National Institutes of Health (2R01DK08506505A1 to SZ).

Author contributions

JY and CY drafted the article. GB and SZ edited the manuscript. All the authors reviewed the manuscript and approved it for publication.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  1. Adli M., Parlak M., Li Y. W., El-Dahr S. S. (2015). Epigenetic States of nephron progenitors and epithelial differentiation. J. Cell. Biochem. 116 (6), 893–902. 10.1002/jcb.25048 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Andersson E. R., Sandberg R., Lendahl U. (2011). Notch signaling: Simplicity in design, versatility in function. Development 138 (17), 3593–3612. 10.1242/dev.063610 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Betz B., Möller-Ehrlich K., Kress T., Kniepert J., Schwedhelm E., Böger R. H., et al. (2013). Increased symmetrical dimethylarginine in ischemic acute kidney injury as a causative factor of renal L-arginine deficiency. Transl. Res. 162 (2), 67–76. 10.1016/j.trsl.2013.04.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Boyle S. C., Liu Z., Kopan R. (2014). Notch signaling is required for the formation of mesangial cells from a stromal mesenchyme precursor during kidney development. Development 141 (2), 346–354. 10.1242/dev.100271 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Braun M. C., Kelly C. N., Prada A. E., Mishra J., Chand D., Devarajan P., et al. (2004). Human PRMT5 expression is enhanced during in vitro tubule formation and after in vivo ischemic injury in renal epithelial cells. Am. J. Nephrol. 24 (2), 250–257. 10.1159/000077397 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Braun C. J., Stanciu M., Boutz P. L., Patterson J. C., Calligaris D., Higuchi F., et al. (2017). Coordinated splicing of regulatory detained introns within oncogenic transcripts creates an exploitable vulnerability in malignant glioma. Cancer Cell 32 (4), 411–426. 10.1016/j.ccell.2017.08.018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen Y. Y., Peng X. F., Liu G. Y., Liu J. S., Sun L., Liu H., et al. (2019). Protein arginine methyltranferase-1 induces ER stress and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in renal tubular epithelial cells and contributes to diabetic nephropathy. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 1865 (10), 2563–2575. 10.1016/j.bbadis.2019.06.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cheng D. Z., He Z. F., Zheng L. C., Xie D. Y., Dong S. W., Zhang P. (2018). PRMT7 contributes to the metastasis phenotype in human non-small-cell lung cancer cells possibly through the interaction with HSPA5 and EEF2. Oncotargets Ther. 11, 4869–4876. 10.2147/OTT.S166412 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Couto E. S. A., Wu C. Y., Citadin C. T., Clemons G. A., Possoit H. E., Grames M. S., et al. (2020). Protein arginine methyltransferases in cardiovascular and neuronal function. Mol. Neurobiol. 57 (3), 1716–1732. 10.1007/s12035-019-01850-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dacwag C. S., Bedford M. T., Sif S., Imbalzano A. N. (2009). Distinct protein arginine methyltransferases promote ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling function at different stages of skeletal muscle differentiation. Mol. Cell Biol. 29, 1909–1921. 10.1128/MCB.00742-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Diao C. H., Chen Z. Y., Qiu T., Liu H., Yang Y. Y., Liu X. H., et al. (2019). Inhibition of PRMT5 attenuates oxidative stress-induced pyroptosis via activation of the Nrf2/HO-1 signal pathway in a mouse model of renal ischemia-reperfusion injury. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2019, 2345658. 10.1155/2019/2345658 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Diao C., Chen Z., Qiu T., Liu H., Yang Y., Liu X., et al. (2019). Inhibition of PRMT5 attenuates oxidative stress-induced pyroptosis via activation of the Nrf2/HO-1 signal pathway in a mouse model of renal ischemia-reperfusion injury. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2019, 2345658. 10.1155/2019/2345658 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dong F., Li Q., Yang C., Huo D., Wang X., Ai C., et al. (2018). PRMT2 links histone H3R8 asymmetric dimethylation to oncogenic activation and tumorigenesis of glioblastoma. Nat. Commun. 9 (1), 4552. 10.1038/s41467-018-06968-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dong R., Li X., Lai K. O. (2021). Activity and function of the PRMT8 protein arginine methyltransferase in neurons. Life (Basel) 11 (11), 1132. 10.3390/life11111132 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dressler G. R. (2009). Advances in early kidney specification, development and patterning. Development 136 (23), 3863–3874. 10.1242/dev.034876 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fabbrizio E., El Messaoudi S., Polanowska J., Paul C., Cook J. R., Lee J. H., et al. (2002). Negative regulation of transcription by the type II arginine methyltransferase PRMT5. EMBO Rep. 3 (7), 641–645. 10.1093/embo-reports/kvf136 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Feng Y., Maity R., Whitelegge J. P., Hadjikyriacou A., Li Z. W., Zurita-Lopez C., et al. (2013). Mammalian protein arginine methyltransferase 7 (PRMT7) specifically targets RXR sites in lysine- and arginine-rich regions. J. Biol. Chem. 288 (52), 37010–37025. 10.1074/jbc.M113.525345 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Guccione E., Bassi C., Casadio F., Martinato F., Cesaroni M., Schuchlautz H., et al. (2007). Methylation of histone H3R2 by PRMT6 and H3K4 by an MLL complex are mutually exclusive. Nature 449 (7164), 933–937. 10.1038/nature06166 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Guo C. Y., Dong G. E., Liang X. L., Dong Z. (2019). Epigenetic regulation in AKI and kidney repair: Mechanisms and therapeutic implications. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 15 (4), 220–239. 10.1038/s41581-018-0103-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hatanaka Y., Tsusaka T., Shimizu N., Morita K., Suzuki T., Machida S., et al. (2017). Histone H3 methylated at arginine 17 is essential for reprogramming the paternal genome in zygotes. Cell Rep. 20 (12), 2756–2765. 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.08.088 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hein K., Mittler G., Cizelsky W., Kuhl M., Ferrante F., Liefke R., et al. (2015). Site-specific methylation of Notch1 controls the amplitude and duration of the Notch1 response. Sci. Signal 8 (369), ra30. 10.1126/scisignal.2005892 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hong E., Lim Y., Lee E., Oh M., Kwon D. (2012). Tissue-specific and age-dependent expression of protein arginine methyltransferases (PRMTs) in male rat tissues. Biogerontology 13 (3), 329–336. 10.1007/s10522-012-9379-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hu G., Yan C., Xie P., Cao Y., Shao J., Ge J. (2020). PRMT2 accelerates tumorigenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma by activating Bcl2 via histone H3R8 methylation. Exp. Cell Res. 394 (2), 112152. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2020.112152 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hung P. H., Hsu Y. C., Chen T. H., Lin C. L. (2021). Recent advances in diabetic kidney diseases: From kidney injury to kidney fibrosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22 (21), 11857. 10.3390/ijms222111857 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hwang J. W., Cho Y., Bae G. U., Kim S. N., Kim Y. K. (2021). Protein arginine methyltransferases: Promising targets for cancer therapy. Exp. Mol. Med. 53 (5), 788–808. 10.1038/s12276-021-00613-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Jelinic P., Stehle J. C., Shaw P. (2006). The testis-specific factor CTCFL cooperates with the protein methyltransferase PRMT7 in H19 imprinting control region methylation. Plos Biol. 4 (11), e355. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040355 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kim M. S., Pinto S. M., Getnet D., Nirujogi R. S., Manda S. S., Chaerkady R., et al. (2014). A draft map of the human proteome. Nature 509 (7502), 575–581. 10.1038/nature13302 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kim J. H., Yoo B. C., Yang W. S., Kim E., Hong S., Cho J. Y. (2016). The role of protein arginine methyltransferases in inflammatory responses. Mediat. Inflamm. 2016, 4028353. 10.1155/2016/4028353 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kobayashi A., Mugford J. W., Krautzberger A. M., Naiman N., Liao J., McMahon A. P. (2014). Identification of a multipotent self-renewing stromal progenitor population during mammalian kidney organogenesis. Stem Cell Rep. 3 (4), 650–662. 10.1016/j.stemcr.2014.08.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kota S. K., Roening C., Patel N., Kota S. B., Baron R. (2018). PRMT5 inhibition promotes osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stromal cells and represses basal interferon stimulated gene expression. Bone 117, 37–46. 10.1016/j.bone.2018.08.025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kumar S. (2018). Cellular and molecular pathways of renal repair after acute kidney injury. Kidney Int. 93 (1), 27–40. 10.1016/j.kint.2017.07.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lee Y. H., Stallcup M. R. (2009). Minireview: Protein arginine methylation of nonhistone proteins in transcriptional regulation. Mol. Endocrinol. 23 (4), 425–433. 10.1210/me.2008-0380 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Lee H. C., Chathuranga K., Lee J. S. (2019). Intracellular sensing of viral genomes and viral evasion. Exp. Mol. Med. 51, 1–13. 10.1038/s12276-019-0299-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Lee Y., Mehrotra P., Basile D., Ullah M., Singh A., Skill N., et al. (2021). Specific lowering of asymmetric dimethylarginine by pharmacological dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase improves endothelial function, reduces blood pressure and ischemia-reperfusion injury. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 376 (2), 181–189. 10.1124/jpet.120.000212 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Lei Y., Han P., Chen Y., Wang H., Wang S., Wang M., et al. (2022). Protein arginine methyltransferase 3 promotes glycolysis and hepatocellular carcinoma growth by enhancing arginine methylation of lactate dehydrogenase A. Clin. Transl. Med. 12 (1), e686. 10.1002/ctm2.686 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Leiper J. M. (2005). The DDAH-ADMA-NOS pathway. Ther. Drug Monit. 27 (6), 744–746. 10.1097/01.ftd.0000179849.42395.11 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Li W. J., He Y. H., Yang J. J., Hu G. S., Lin Y. A., Ran T., et al. (2021). Profiling PRMT methylome reveals roles of hnRNPA1 arginine methylation in RNA splicing and cell growth. Nat. Commun. 12 (1), 1946. 10.1038/s41467-021-21963-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Lim S. K., Jeong Y. W., Kim D. I., Park M. J., Choi J. H., Kim S. U., et al. (2013). Activation of PRMT1 and PRMT5 mediates hypoxia- and ischemia-induced apoptosis in human lung epithelial cells and the lung of miniature pigs: The role of p38 and JNK mitogen-activated protein kinases. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 440 (4), 707–713. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.09.136 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Lin E. E., Sequeira-Lopez M. L., Gomez R. A. (2014). RBP-J in FOXD1+ renal stromal progenitors is crucial for the proper development and assembly of the kidney vasculature and glomerular mesangial cells. Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 306 (2), F249–F258. 10.1152/ajprenal.00313.2013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Little M. H., Brennan J., Georgas K., Davies J. A., Davidson D. R., Baldock R. A., et al. (2007). A high-resolution anatomical ontology of the developing murine genitourinary tract. Gene Expr. Patterns 7 (6), 680–699. 10.1016/j.modgep.2007.03.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Liu C., Tao T., Xu B., Lu K., Zhang L., Jiang L., et al. (2015). BTG1 potentiates apoptosis and suppresses proliferation in renal cell carcinoma by interacting with PRMT1. Oncol. Lett. 10 (2), 619–624. 10.3892/ol.2015.3293 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Liu M., Yao B., Gui T., Guo C., Wu X., Li J., et al. (2020). PRMT5-dependent transcriptional repression of c-Myc target genes promotes gastric cancer progression. Theranostics 10 (10), 4437–4452. 10.7150/thno.42047 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Liu F., Wan L., Zou H., Pan Z., Zhou W., Lu X. (2020). PRMT7 promotes the growth of renal cell carcinoma through modulating the beta-catenin/C-MYC axis. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 120, 105686. 10.1016/j.biocel.2020.105686 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Liu Y., Li L., Liu X., Wang Y., Liu L., Peng L., et al. (2020). Arginine methylation of SHANK2 by PRMT7 promotes human breast cancer metastasis through activating endosomal FAK signalling. Elife 9, e57617. 10.7554/eLife.57617 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  45. Liu Y. (2011). Cellular and molecular mechanisms of renal fibrosis. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 7 (12), 684–696. 10.1038/nrneph.2011.149 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Lopez M. L. S. S., Gomez R. A. (2011). Development of the renal arterioles. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 22 (12), 2156–2165. 10.1681/asn.2011080818 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Matsuguma K., Ueda S., Yamagishi S. I., Matsumoto Y., Kaneyuki U., Shibata R., et al. (2006). Molecular mechanism for elevation of asymmetric dimethylarginine and its role for hypertension in chronic kidney disease. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 17 (8), 2176–2183. 10.1681/ASN.2005121379 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. McLaughlin N., Wang F., Saifudeen Z., El-Dahr S. S. (2014). In situ histone landscape of nephrogenesis. Epigenetics 9 (2), 222–235. 10.4161/epi.26793 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Mohamed T., Sequeira-Lopez M. L. S. (2019). Development of the renal vasculature. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 91, 132–146. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2018.06.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Mosammaparast N., Shi Y. (2010). Reversal of histone methylation: Biochemical and molecular mechanisms of histone demethylases. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 79, 155–179. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.78.070907.103946 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Nakayama Y., Ueda S., Yamagishi S., Obara N., Taguchi K., Ando R., et al. (2014). Asymmetric dimethylarginine accumulates in the kidney during ischemia/reperfusion injury. Kidney Int. 85 (3), 570–578. 10.1038/ki.2013.398 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Nott T. J., Petsalaki E., Farber P., Jervis D., Fussner E., Plochowietz A., et al. (2015). Phase transition of a disordered nuage protein generates environmentally responsive membraneless organelles. Mol. Cell 57 (5), 936–947. 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.01.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Okubo K., Hayashi K., Wakino S., Matsuda H., Kubota E., Honda M., et al. (2005). Role of asymmetrical dimethylarginine in renal microvascular endothelial dysfunction in chronic renal failure with hypertension. Hypertens. Res. 28 (2), 181–189. 10.1291/hypres.28.181 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Park M. J., Han H. J., Kim D. I. (2017). Lipotoxicity-induced PRMT1 exacerbates mesangial cell apoptosis via endoplasmic reticulum stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 18 (7), 1421. 10.3390/ijms18071421 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Qi C., Chang J., Zhu Y., Yeldandi A. V., Rao S. M., Zhu Y. J. (2002). Identification of protein arginine methyltransferase 2 as a coactivator for estrogen receptor alpha. J. Biol. Chem. 277 (32), 28624–28630. 10.1074/jbc.M201053200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Quillien A., Gilbert G., Boulet M., Ethuin S., Waltzer L., Vandel L. (2021). Prmt5 promotes vascular morphogenesis independently of its methyltransferase activity. PLoS Genet. 17 (6), e1009641. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009641 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Reidy K. J., Rosenblum N. D. (2009). Cell and molecular biology of kidney development. Seminars Nephrol. 29 (4), 321–337. 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2009.03.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Sarker R. S. J., Conlon T. M., Morrone C., Srivastava B., Konyalilar N., Verleden S. E., et al. (2019). CARM1 regulates senescence during airway epithelial cell injury in COPD pathogenesis. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 317 (5), L602–L14. 10.1152/ajplung.00441.2018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Sato Y., Takahashi M., Yanagita M. (2020). Pathophysiology of AKI to CKD progression. Semin. Nephrol. 40 (2), 206–215. 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2020.01.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Schedl A., Hastie N. D. (2000). Cross-talk in kidney development. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 10 (5), 543–549. 10.1016/s0959-437x(00)00125-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Schneider L., Herkt S., Wang L., Feld C., Wesely J., Kuvardina O. N., et al. (2021). PRMT6 activates cyclin D1 expression in conjunction with the transcription factor LEF1. Oncogenesis 10 (5), 42. 10.1038/s41389-021-00332-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Stopa N., Krebs J. E., Shechter D. (2015). The PRMT5 arginine methyltransferase: Many roles in development, cancer and beyond. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 72 (11), 2041–2059. 10.1007/s00018-015-1847-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Tain Y. L., Ghosh S., Krieg R. J., Baylis C. (2011). Reciprocal changes of renal neuronal nitric oxide synthase-alpha and -beta associated with renal progression in a neonatal 5/6 nephrectomized rat model. Pediatr. Neonatol. 52 (2), 66–72. 10.1016/j.pedneo.2011.02.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Tanemoto F., Mimura I. (2022). Therapies targeting epigenetic alterations in acute kidney injury-to-chronic kidney disease transition. Pharm. (Basel). 15 (2), 123. 10.3390/ph15020123 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Tang J. H., Zhuang S. G. (2015). Epigenetics in acute kidney injury. Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hy 24 (4), 351–358. 10.1097/MNH.0000000000000140 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Tavakoli Dargani Z., Singla D. K. (2019). Embryonic stem cell-derived exosomes inhibit doxorubicin-induced TLR4-NLRP3-mediated cell death-pyroptosis. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 317 (2), H460–H71. 10.1152/ajpheart.00056.2019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Tewary S. K., Zheng Y. G., Ho M. C. (2019). Protein arginine methyltransferases: Insights into the enzyme structure and mechanism at the atomic level. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 76 (15), 2917–2932. 10.1007/s00018-019-03145-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Ueda S., Yamagishi S., Matsumoto Y., Kaida Y., Fujimi-Hayashida A., Koike K., et al. (2009). Involvement of asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) in glomerular capillary loss and sclerosis in a rat model of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Life Sci. 84 (23-24), 853–856. 10.1016/j.lfs.2009.03.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Vougiouklakis T., Nakamura Y., Saloura V. (2017). Critical roles of protein methyltransferases and demethylases in the regulation of embryonic stem cell fate. Epigenetics 12 (12), 1015–1027. 10.1080/15592294.2017.1391430 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Walker C., Burggren W. (2020). Remodeling the epigenome and (epi)cytoskeleton: A new paradigm for co-regulation by methylation. J. Exp. Biol. 223, jeb220632. 10.1242/jeb.220632 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Wang Y., Niu M., Yin S., Zhang F., Shi R. (2018). Nephroprotective effects of nebivolol in 2K1C rats through regulation of the kidney ROS-ADMA-NO pathway. Pharmacol. Rep. 70 (5), 917–929. 10.1016/j.pharep.2018.04.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Wang B., Zhang M., Liu Z., Mu Y., Li K. (2021). PRMT7: A pivotal arginine methyltransferase in stem cells and development. Stem Cells Int. 2021, 6241600. 10.1155/2021/6241600 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Wang Y., Wu M., Yang F., Lin J., Zhang L., Yuan M., et al. (2022). Protein arginine methyltransferase 3 inhibits renal tubulointerstitial fibrosis through asymmetric dimethylarginine. Front. Med. (Lausanne) 9, 995917. 10.3389/fmed.2022.995917 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Whelton P. K., Carey R. M., Aronow W. S., Casey D. E., Jr., Collins K. J., Dennison Himmelfarb C., et al. (2017). 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: A report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on clinical practice guidelines. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 71 (19), e127–e248. 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.11.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Wu M., Lin P., Li L., Chen D., Yang X., Xu L., et al. (2019). Reduced asymmetric dimethylarginine accumulation through inhibition of the type I protein arginine methyltransferases promotes renal fibrosis in obstructed kidneys. FASEB J. 33 (6), 6948–6956. 10.1096/fj.201802585RR [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Wu Q., Schapira M., Arrowsmith C. H., Barsyte-Lovejoy D. (2021). Protein arginine methylation: From enigmatic functions to therapeutic targeting. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 20, 509–530. 10.1038/s41573-021-00159-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Xu J., Richard S. 2021. Cellular pathways influenced by protein arginine methylation: Implications for cancer. 2021 nov 4. Report No.: 1097-4164 (Electronic)1097-2765 (linking) contract No.: 21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Yan F. Z., Qian H., Liu F., Ding C. H., Liu S. Q., Xiao M. C., et al. (2022). Inhibition of protein arginine methyltransferase 1 alleviates liver fibrosis by attenuating the activation of hepatic stellate cells in mice. FASEB J. 36 (9), e22489. 10.1096/fj.202200238R [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Yang G., Zhou C., Wang R., Huang S., Wei Y., Yang X., et al. (2019). Base-editing-mediated R17H substitution in histone H3 reveals methylation-dependent regulation of yap signaling and early mouse embryo development. Cell Rep. 26 (2), 302–312. 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.12.046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Yu Y. S., Shin H. R., Kim D., Baek S. A., Choi S. A., Ahn H., et al. (2020). Pontin arginine methylation by CARM1 is crucial for epigenetic regulation of autophagy. Nat. Commun. 11 (1), 6297. 10.1038/s41467-020-20080-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Zakrzewicz D., Zakrzewicz A., Wilker S., Boedeker R. H., Padberg W., Eickelberg O., et al. (2011). Dimethylarginine metabolism during acute and chronic rejection of rat renal allografts. Nephrol. Dial. Transpl. 26 (1), 124–135. 10.1093/ndt/gfq392 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Zakrzewicz D., Zakrzewicz A., Didiasova M., Korencak M., Kosanovic D., Schermuly R. T., et al. (2015). Elevated protein arginine methyltransferase 1 expression regulates fibroblast motility in pulmonary fibrosis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1852 (12), 2678–2688. 10.1016/j.bbadis.2015.09.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Zhang C., Zhuang S. (2020). The role of protein arginine methyltransferases in kidney diseases. Clin. Sci. (Lond). 134 (15), 2037–2051. 10.1042/CS20200680 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Zhao J., Adams A., Weinman S. A., Tikhanovich I. (2019). Hepatocyte PRMT1 protects from alcohol induced liver injury by modulating oxidative stress responses. Sci. Rep. 9 (1), 9111. 10.1038/s41598-019-45585-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Zheng Z., Schmidt-Ott K. M., Chua S., Foster K. A., Frankel R. Z., Pavlidis P., et al. (2005). A Mendelian locus on chromosome 16 determines susceptibility to doxorubicin nephropathy in the mouse. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102 (7), 2502–2507. 10.1073/pnas.0409786102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Zhu Y., Yu C., Zhuang S. (2020). Protein arginine methyltransferase 1 mediates renal fibroblast activation and fibrogenesis through activation of Smad3 signaling. Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 318 (2), F375–F87. 10.1152/ajprenal.00487.2019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Zhu Y. (2018). PRMT1 mediates podocyte injury and glomerular fibrosis through phosphorylation of ERK pathway. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 495 (1), 828–838. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.11.057 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Zurita-Lopez C. I., Sandberg T., Kelly R., Clarke S. G. (2012). Human protein arginine methyltransferase 7 (PRMT7) is a type III enzyme forming omega-NG-monomethylated arginine residues. J. Biol. Chem. 287 (11), 7859–7870. 10.1074/jbc.M111.336271 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Pharmacology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES