Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 3;14:1128971. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1128971

Table 2.

Item analysis (N = 170).

Item Extreme group comparison Item-total correlation Cronbach’s α if item deleted McDonald’s omega if the item is deleted Numbers of substandard indicators Note
Criterial ratio
1 6.497** 0.563** 0.916 0.916 0 Retained
2 7.612** 0.542** 0.916 0.916 0 Retained
3 3.767** 0.283 ** 0.922 0.923 1 Retained
4 10.576** 0.701** 0.912 0.912 0 Retained
5 11.907** 0.705** 0.912 0.912 0 Retained
6 8.846** 0.629** 0.914 0.915 0 Retained
7 12.077** 0.761** 0.911 0.911 0 Retained
8 7.515** 0.584** 0.916 0.916 0 Retained
9 7.169** 0.600** 0.915 0.915 0 Retained
10 7.436** 0.574** 0.915 0.915 0 Retained
11 11.871** 0.745** 0.910 0.911 0 Retained
12 11.019** 0.716** 0.911 0.911 0 Retained
13 8.717** 0.567** 0.914 0.915 0 Retained
14 10.548** 0.632** 0.914 0.915 0 Retained
15 10.382** 0.632** 0.914 0.914 0 Retained
16 11.551** 0.686** 0.912 0.913 0 Retained
17 12.953** 0.707** 0.912 0.912 0 Retained

Bold values is the character that mean the indicator is substandard. C-FFCS, Chinese version of the fathers’ fear of childbirth scale. **p < 0.01.