Table 5.

Relationship between TyG-BMI and the risk of diabetes in participants with prediabetes in different sensitivity analyses.

Exposure	Model I (HR, 95%CI) P	Model II (HR, 95%CI) P	Model III (HR, 95%CI) P
TyG-BMI	1.011 (1.010, 1.012) < 0.001	1.011 (1.010, 1.012) < 0.001	1.015 (1.011, 1.018) < 0.001
TyG-BMI quartile
Q1	Ref	Ref	Ref
Q2	1.738 (1.466, 2.061) < 0.001	1.775 (1.513, 2.084) < 0.001	1.687 (1.431, 1.989) < 0.001
Q3	2.541 (2.158, 2.992) < 0.001	2.570 (2.204, 2.996) < 0.001	2.510 (2.076, 3.035) < 0.001
Q4	3.272 (2.776, 3.856) < 0.001	3.458 (2.970, 4.026) < 0.001	1.869 (1.187, 2.944) 0.007
P-for trend	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001

Model I was a sensitivity analysis performed on participants who had never consumed alcohol (N = 20,484). We adjusted age, sex, SBP, DBP ALT, AST, BUN, LDL-C, HDL-c, family history of diabetes, and smoking status.

Model II was a sensitivity analysis performed on participants without a family history of diabetes (N = 24,654). We adjusted age, sex, SBP, DBP ALT, AST, BUN, LDL-C, HDL-c, drinking status, and smoking status.

Model III was a sensitivity analysis performed after excluding participants with BMI≥25 kg/m² (N = 13,571). We adjusted age, sex, SBP, DBP ALT, AST, BUN, LDL-C, HDL-c, drinking status, smoking status, and family history of diabetes.

HR, Hazard ratios; CI, confidence; Ref, reference.