Skip to main content
. 2009 Jan 3;68(1):66–79. doi: 10.1007/s00239-008-9188-z

Table 1.

Anopheles species used in this study with length and G+C variation of cloned ITS sequences

Species Geographic origin No. of individuals No. of clones ITS1 length (bp) ITS1 G+C% ITS1 mean p-distance ITS2 length (bp) ITS2 G+C%
An. farauti Rabaul (PNG) 12 22 841–1138 54–58 0.0076 554* 69
Northern Territory (AUS) 1 3 1204–1491 58–59.8 0.0017 549 68.9
Central Province (PNG) 1 4 1167–1194 57.2–57.3 0.0034 562* 68.5
An. irenicus Guadalcanal (Sol Is) 3 9 1197–1584 57.6–60 0.0045 560* 69.3
An. farauti 6 Irian Jaya (Indo) 2 3 1169–1175 55.9–56 0.0046 549 66.5
An. hinesorum Queensland (Aus) 4 10 1162–1486 55.6–57.8 0.0068 555 66.3
An. torresiensis Queensland (Aus) 5 8 1183–1200 62.4–63.2 0.0058 533 71.3
An. koliensis Madang Province (PNG) 2 3 1467–1469 61.2 0.0143 591 67.9
Central Province (PNG) 1 2 1465–1480 61.1 0.0055
An. punctulatus Madang Province (PNG) 3 7 1590–1799 63–64.1 0.0059 551 67.3
An. sp. nr punctulatus Southern Highlands (PNG) 3 7 1706–2006 60.5–61.3 0.0038 557 64.8
An. clowi Irian Jaya (Indo) 1 3 548–731 54.4–55.1 0.0030 579* 64.9
An. annulipes sp. l Karumba (Aus) 1 3 1370 53.1–53.2 0.0024 415* 65.3

Note: Aus Australia, PNG Papua New Guinea, Sol Is Solomon Islands, Indo Indonesia

* ITS2 sequences isolated in this study; all others from Beebe et al. (1999)