. 2023 Jan 7;40(2):289–299. doi: 10.1007/s10815-022-02695-7

Table 2.

Study data comparing patient age, euploid rate, aneuploid rate and simple mosaic rate between subjective NGS and AI 1.0 or AI 2.0 using SART age group stratification. Listed confidence intervals describe the differences in AI means vs the subjective NGS mean

Maternal age (yr)	Platform	Cases (n)	Euploid (%)	p	95% CI	Aneuploid (%)	p	95% CI	Simple mosaic (%)	p	95% CI
< 35	Subjective	715	43.6	-		36.2	-		20.2	-	-
	AI 1.0	221	53.3^*	< 0.001	0.051–0.142	31.1^*	0.047	− 0.101–0.001	15.6^*	0.004	− 0.079–0.013
	AI 2.0	151	51.3^*	0.002	0.025–0.129	33.8	0.588	− 0.083–0.035	14.9^*	0.005	− .092–0.014
35–37	Subjective	693	35.6	-		47.2	-		17.2	-	-
	AI 1.0	170	41.9^*	0.001	0.013–0.113	42.8	0.152	− 0.100–0.012	15.3	0.440	− 0.056–0.018
	AI 2.0	155	46.6^*	< 0.001	0.058–0.162	40.4^*	0.018	− 0.126–0.010	13.0	0.300	− 0.081–0.003
38–40	Subjective	885	25.6	-		61.8	-		12.7	-	-
	AI 1.0	237	34.5^*	< 0.001	0.046–0.132	57.4	0.078	− 0.092–0.004	8.2^*	0.003	− 0.077–0.013
	AI 2.0	159	30.5	0.058	− 0.001–0.010	60.1	0.722	− 0.074–0.038	9.5	0.108	− 0.069–0.005
41	Subjective	317	16.2	-		74.7	-		9.2	-	-
	AI 1.0	67	23.4	0.101	− 0.011–0.157	69.7	0.412	− 0.144–0.044	6.7	0.601	− 0.087–0.037
	AI 2.0	74	20.6	0.345	− 0.031–0.119	73.6	0.947	− 0.095–0.073	5.8	0.318	− 0.090–0.053
42	Subjective	252	13.4	-		80.8	-		5.9	-	-
	AI 1.0	56	8.9	0.426	− 0.131–0.041	87.1	0.268	− 0.034–0.160	4.0	0.756	− 0.083–0.045
	AI 2.0	37	14.9	0.934	− 0.088–0.118	81.4	0.991	− 0.109–0.121	3.6	0.749	− 0.099–0.053
> 42	Subjective	362	17.5	-		73.5	-		9.0	-	-
	AI 1.0	72	12.0	0.114	− 0.131–0.041	79.7	0.194	− 0.023–0.147	8.3	0.952	− 0.063–0.049
	AI 2.0	55	3.7^*	< 0.001	− 0.223–0.053	95.2^*	< 0.001	0.122–0.313	1.2^*	0.012	− 0.141–0.015

^*p < 0.05 compared to subjective