Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 6;191(2):253–265. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfac136

Table 2.

Histological assessment of hPCLS

hPCLS type Treatment D1
D8
D15
D22
D29
AVE±SD AVE±SD AVE±SD AVE±SD AVE±SD
H&E Fresh VC 87 ± 3 78 ± 3 82 ± 3 80 ± 0 73 ± 3
LPS 80 ± 9 87 ± 6 83 ± 6 80 ± 0 77 ± 6
Cryo 1 VC 83 ± 8 85 ± 5 80 ± 5 80 ± 0 82 ± 8
LPS 75 ± 9 83 ± 3 80 ± 5 83 ± 3 75 ± 5
Cryo 2 VC 60 ± 10 78 ± 3 82 ± 3 80 ± 5 78 ± 3
LPS 68 ± 8 75 ± 5 75 ± 0 77 ± 6 78 ± 3
AQ5 Fresh VC 197 ± 6 190 ± 0 185 ± 5 177 ± 32 165 ± 18
LPS 177 ± 25 203 ± 6 203 ± 6 187 ± 25 178 ± 8
Cryo 1 VC 160 ± 42 197 ± 6 197 ± 12 197 ± 6 160 ± 20
LPS 177 ± 15 217 ± 6 190 ± 26 213 ± 12 173 ± 12
Cryo 2 VC 133 ± 25 193 ± 15 203 ± 12 217 ± 6 203 ± 25
LPS 137 ± 12 197 ± 23 207 ± 6 207 ± 15 177 ± 15

Notes: Evaluation of H&E- and AQ5-stained sections at days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29 indicates comparable results throughout the ∼4-week culture period. All groups (Fresh, Cryo 1, and Cryo 2) yielded ≥75% “normal” morphological characteristics (H&E) for both VC- and LPS-treated hPCLS, with the exception of Cryo 2 at day 1. A general concordance with WST-8 viability (Figure 3) was seen. Similar results were observed for AQ5 levels with no significant differences among the groups, N = 3/group per time point.