Skip to main content
. 2022 May 25;76(3):621–631. doi: 10.1177/17470218221095755

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Reaction time data for working memory task of Experiment 1. Irrelevant and novel probes (left graph) require a “no” response and are of primary interest for the present study as they are used to calculate the intrusion effect. Participants exhibited an intrusion effect (longer reaction times to irrelevant than novel probes) for both repeat and non-repeat objects; this effect was larger for repeat objects. Relevant probes (right graph) require a “yes” response and are not used to calculate the intrusion effect. Error bars in all figures are corrected (Morey, 2008) within-subject standard errors (Cousineau, 2005). Numbers inside the bars in all figures indicate the error percentage (and corrected within-subject standard errors) for each condition. Dots on each bar in all figures indicate the average reaction time for each participant for each condition.