Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar;190:106831. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106831

Table 2.

Main environmental impacts of texturized and cooked plant-based products used as meat substitutes (basis: legumes, cereals, other vegetable biomass and their mixtures)

Impact categories GHGE, kgCO2eq. LU, m2 WF, L NRE, MJ
Impact values 2.11
3.1-4.04
1.3-2.46
2.0-13.07
1.5-2.8*, 7
22.48
0.5-1.79,10
7.011
1.6-3.74
2.5-6.59
0.4-3.910
3.511
9.74
106.84
3800.0-38950.05,*
12100.08
17.0-70.09
180.011
54.04
384.48
6.8-15.89
4.4-17.710

Note: the values in the table are rounded; GHGE – greenhouse gases emissions; LU – land use; WF- water footprint; NRE – non-renewable energy; 1 - (Fresán et al., 2019); 2 - (Heusala et al., 2020b); 3 - (Lie-Piang et al., 2021); 4 - (Heller and Keoleian, 2018; Khan et al., 2019); 5 - (Berardy et al., 2015); 6 – value indicated for extruded mixtures (Detzel et al., 2021); 7 - (Mejia et al., 2018); 8 - (Saget et al., 2021); 9 – vegan and vegetarian replacers (van Mierlo et al., 2017); 10 – burger patty (Saerens et al., 2021; Smetana et al., 2021); 11 - plant-based burger (Goldstein et al., 2017); * - value indicated for general category of plan-based meat substitutes.