|
IMPLEMENTATION STEPS |
BELGIUM |
SWITZERLAND |
FRANCE |
IRELAND |
ICELAND |
FINLAND |
NEW ZEALAND |
|
1 |
Translation into national languages (Dutch, French and German).
Adaptation of the instruments and manuals to the Belgian social care and health care settings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transparent process to select interRAI (Tools Review).
Business cases approved
Project management infrastructure established.
Active communication with the sector.
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
Creation of an IT platform allowing professional caregivers from several disciplines to fill out the instruments in a multidisciplinary way (physicians, nurses, physiotherapists, occupational therapists, social assistants, etc.).
|
|
|
|
|
Creation of Educational model how to assess the needs, and understand the scales (Chydenius Institute)
Building up a commercial feasible software for data collection and creation of individual care plan (RAIsoft.ltd)
Creation of first version of benchmarking the outcomes of care including: 1) safe digital transference of the person level data (STAKES/THL)
Creation of unit/organization organisation/national level feed-back reports
Creation of different types of seminars according the needs of participants
|
Single software platform developed.
National training service developed.
Contract with international software vendor.
Contract with international e-learning system vendor.
|
|
4 |
|
Defining, designing small-scale pilots. Guaranteeing the conditions: software, training, local support, project managers, budget, academic participation.
|
|
|
|
Collecting data of unit-level costs of care. Due to scattered way of governance, it turned out impossible to find or calculate information on costs, in compatible ways. In 2000 there were more than 400 independent regional jurisdictions, with non-compatible ways of calculating costs, in the country, and in 2022 still over 300.
|
A (4 year) – national implementation project that encouraged ownership and autonomy at the local level as long as national project parameters were met.
Change management techniques for clinicians and managers.
Data services strategy developed.
Demonstrations of the aggregated data and potential use to inform planning.
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strong sector engagement through meetings, conferences and successful pilots and projects.
Focus on the value of interRAI assessment for the person’s role, their client’s welfare and their organisational efficiency.
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
interRAI New Zealand established with ongoing funding from Ministry of Health for: Governance Board, Education and Support Service, Software Service, Data Services, Website and newsletters
|
|
7 |
|
Regular free-of-charge conferences on evidence-based care and various forms of interRAI applications locally and internationally.
Create a community of users and future users.
Preparing upscaling from pilot to integration in routine use: train-the-trainer, e-learnings, funding, licensing, support
|
|
|
|
|
Establishment of an iterative process for introducing new interRAI assessment versions building on sector support for example introducing the Palliative Care assessment to the sector
Building relationships with researchers and developing an interRAI research community
|
|
8 |
|
Policy considerations.
Preparation and rollout of the switch from MDS-version to Suite. Train-the-trainer, licensing software vendors, updates manuals, progress evaluation.
|
|
|
|
|
Undertaking and responding to independent reviews
Implementation requirements (2005)
The LTCF Implementation (2018)
Review of Service Design (2020)
|
|