Table 2.
Study | Randomization method | Treatment allocation concealed | Blinding of patients and providers | Blind assessors | No baseline group difference | Drop-out rate >20% | Drop-out rates between groups, >15% | Treatment protocol adherence | Other treatment avoided or similar | Valid and reliable outcomes measures | Sample size with at least 80% power | Pre-specified outcome analyses | ITT analysis |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||||
Britton et al., 2018 | Good | Good | Fair | Good | Good | Good | Good | Good | Good | Fair | Good | Good | Fair |
| |||||||||||||
Chiesa et al., 2015 | Good | Good | CD | Good | Good | Good | Good | Poor | Good | Good | Good | Good | Good |
| |||||||||||||
Lindsay, Chin et al., 2018, Chin et al., 2019 | Good | Good | Fair | Good | Good | Good | Good | Good | Good | Good | Good | Good | Good |
| |||||||||||||
Lindsay, Chin et al., 2018, Lindsay et al., 2019, Lindsay, Young et al., 2018 | Good | Good | Good | Good | Good | Good | Good | Good | Good | Good | Good | Good | Good |
| |||||||||||||
Valdez et al., 2016 | Good | NR | Good | Good | Good | NA | NA | Good | NA | Good | Poor | Good | Good |
| |||||||||||||
Williams et al., 2014 | Good | Good | Poor | Good | Good | Good | Good | Good | Good | Good | Good | Good | Good |
Note. NR=not reported; CD=could not determine; NA=not applicable