Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Feb 17.
Published in final edited form as: Mindfulness (N Y). 2020 Jul 25;11(11):2470–2485. doi: 10.1007/s12671-020-01444-0

Table 2.

Risk of bias considerations based on the NIH Quality Assessment of Controlled Intervention Studies tool

Study Randomization method Treatment allocation concealed Blinding of patients and providers Blind assessors No baseline group difference Drop-out rate >20% Drop-out rates between groups, >15% Treatment protocol adherence Other treatment avoided or similar Valid and reliable outcomes measures Sample size with at least 80% power Pre-specified outcome analyses ITT analysis

Britton et al., 2018 Good Good Fair Good Good Good Good Good Good Fair Good Good Fair

Chiesa et al., 2015 Good Good CD Good Good Good Good Poor Good Good Good Good Good

Lindsay, Chin et al., 2018, Chin et al., 2019 Good Good Fair Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good

Lindsay, Chin et al., 2018, Lindsay et al., 2019, Lindsay, Young et al., 2018 Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good

Valdez et al., 2016 Good NR Good Good Good NA NA Good NA Good Poor Good Good

Williams et al., 2014 Good Good Poor Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good

Note. NR=not reported; CD=could not determine; NA=not applicable