Table 3.
Adjusted modified Poisson regression models of latent class correlates of provider characteristic ratings, weighted.
| Model 1 |
Model 2 |
Model 3 |
Model 4 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall quality |
Communication |
Respect |
Listened carefully |
|
| aIRR (95% CI) | aIRR (95% CI) | aIRR (95% CI) | aIRR (95% CI) | |
|
| ||||
| Class membership | ||||
| Low Discrimination | REF | REF | REF | REF |
| High Racial and Ethnic Discrimination | 2.06 (1.08–3.93) | 1.97 (1.0–3.63) | 2.16 (0.78–5.94) | 2.41 (1.27–4.59) |
| Vicarious Linguistic Discrimination | 0.85 (0.42–1.71) | 1.15 (0.64–2.05) | 2.12 (1.20–3.72) | 1.67 (1.03–2.71) |
| Elevated Personal and Vicarious Racial Discrimination | 1.59 (0.94–2.70) | 1.53 (0.91–2.60) | 1.90 (1.05–3.42) | 2.18 (1.29–3.66) |
| Covariates | ||||
| Race/Ethnicity | ||||
| White, non-Hispanic | REF | REF | REF | REF |
| Black, non-Hispanic | 1.15 (0.69–1.94) | 1.07 (0.66–1.72) | 1.11 (0.64–1.92) | 1.01 (0.63–1.64) |
| Hispanic | 1.13 (0.70–1.83) | 0.96 (0.61–1.49) | 0.77 (0.43–1.38) | 0.87 (0.56–1.35) |
| Age | 0.99 (0.98–1.01) | 0.99 (0.98–1.00) | 0.99 (0.97–1.01) | 0.99 (0.98–1.00) |
| Gender | ||||
| Male | REF | REF | REF | REF |
| Female | 0.82 (0.54–1.25) | 0.79 (0.54–1.16) | 0.70 (0.44–1.10) | 0.88 (0.59–1.28) |
| Marital status | ||||
| Not married | REF | REF | REF | REF |
| Married | 1.22 (0.81–1.84) | 1.22 (0.84–1.78) | 1.34 (0.82–2.18) | 1.26 (0.87–1.81) |
| Education status | ||||
| Less than high school | REF | REF | REF | REF |
| High School | 0.74 (0.42–1.30) | 0.89 (0.52–1.52) | 0.93 (0.48–1.80) | 0.86 (0.52–1.44) |
| Some College | 0.72 (0.42–1.25) | 0.74 (0.44–1.24) | 0.56 (0.29–1.07) | 0.68 (0.43–1.08) |
| Bachelor’s degree or higher | 0.46 (0.21–0.98) | 0.64 (0.33–1.24) | 0.37 (0.15–0.89) | 0.44 (0.22–0.88) |
| Employment status | ||||
| Not working/unemployed | REF | REF | REF | REF |
| Employed | 0.66 (0.44–1.00) | 0.70 (0.48–1.03) | 0.86 (0.53–1.40) | 0.75 (0.52–1.08) |
| Past year service frequency | 0.78 (0.63–0.96) | 0.79 (0.66–0.95) | 0.96 (0.79–1.16) | 0.79 (0.68–0.92) |
aIRR = adjusted Incidence Rate Ratio, CI= Confidence Interval, ref = reference group, Bold parameters are significant at p < 0.05.
Model 1: Provider quality (compared to “excellent-good” rating); Model 2: Provider communication (compared to “excellent-good” rating); Model 3: Provider respect (compared to “always-usually” frequency); Model 4: Provider listened carefully (compared to “always-usually” frequency).