Skip to main content
letter
. 2023 Feb 6;49:100–103. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.01.002

Table 2.

Disease response, control, and progression rates a in response-evaluable patients with and without cutaneous toxicity (n = 51)

N (%)
Pts without cutaneous toxicity (N = 25) Pts with cutaneous toxicity (N = 26) Risk difference (95% CI) (toxicity vs nontoxicity) p value
Disease response 6 (24.0) 15 (57.7) 33.7% (5.6%–57.9%) 0.0145
CR 3 (11.5) 11.5% (–3.9% to 30.6%) 0.2353
PR 6 (24.0) 12 (46.2) 22.2% (–4.9% to 47.0%) 0.0979
Disease control 16 (64.0) 19 (73.1) 9.1% (–17.1% to 34.9%) 0.4849
SD 10 (40.0) 4 (15.4) –24.6% (–48.4% to 0.8%) 0.0644
MR 3 (11.5) 11.5% (–3.9% to 30.6%) 0.2353
PD 9 (36.0) 4 (15.4) –20.6% (–44.9% to 4.0%) 0.1164

CI = confidence interval; CR = complete response; MR = mixed response; PD = disease progression; PR = partial response; Pts = patients; RECIST = Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; SD = stable disease; UTUC = upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

a

Based on best physician-determined RECIST response.