Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 17;14:21. doi: 10.1007/s12672-023-00614-5

Table  2.

Kaplan‒Meier plots evaluating the OS of CRC and its PTL as a function of seven prognostic factors (STK1p, CEA, CA19.9, TNM stage, pathological grade, age and sex)

Item Log-rank test (P-value) X2
A. CRC
 1. STK1p, ≤ 0.9 vs. > 0.9 pM 0.003 15.371
 2. CEA, ≤ 5 vs. > 5 ng/ml 0.000 26.715
 3. CA19.9, ≤ 35 vs. > 35 ng/ml 0.000 34.834
 4. TNM stage, I + II vs. III 0.000 54.093
 5. Pathological grades, G1 + G2 vs. G3 0.005 8.057
 6. Age, > 60  ≤ 60 ys. 0.035 4.42
 7. Sex, F. vs. M 0.033 4.566
B. R-CC
 1. STK1p, ≤ 0.9 vs. > 0.9 pM 0.051 3.794
 2. CEA, ≤ 5 vs. > 5 ng/ml 0.154 2.073
 3. CA19.9, ≤ 35 vs. > 35 ng/ml 0.113 2.509
 4. TNM stage, I + II vs. III 0.006 7.476
 5. Pathological grades, G1 + G2 vs. G3 0.188 1.73
 6. Age, > 60 ≤ 60 ys. 0.671 0.18
 7. Sex, F. vs. M 0.667 0.185
C. L-CC
 1. STK1p, ≤ 0.9 vs. > 0.9 pM 0.037 4.371
 2. CEA, ≤ 5 vs. > 5 ng/ml 0.054 3.726
 3. CA19.9, ≤ 35 vs. > 35 ng/ml 0.067 3.352
 4. TNM stage, I + II vs. III 0.000 12.332
 5. Pathological grades, G1 + G2 vs. G3 0.256 1.241
 6. Age, > 60  ≤ 60 ys. 0.027 4.915
 7. Sex, F. vs. M 0.108 2.586
D. RC
 1. STK1p, ≤ 0.9 vs. > 0.9 pM 0.002 9.401
 2. CEA, ≤ 5 vs. > 5 ng/ml 0.000 25.189
 3. CA19.9, ≤ 35 vs. > 35 ng/ml 0.000 38.996
 4. TNM stage, I + II vs. III 0.000 34.554
 5. Pathological grades, G1 + G2 vs. G3 0.03 8.708
 6. Age, > 60 ≤ 60 ys. 0.119 2.433
 7. Sex, F. vs. M 0.156 2.01

Black bold: P-values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant