Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 17;14:21. doi: 10.1007/s12672-023-00614-5

Table  4.

COX multivariate analysis for OS of CRC (A), R-CC (B), L-CC (C) and RC (D)

COX multivariate analysis Hazard risk 95% CI p value
A. CRC
 STK1p, ≤ 0.9 vs. > 0.9 pM 1.828 1.242–2.691 0.002
 CEA, ≤ 5 vs. > 5 ng/ml 1.539 1.539–1.102 0.013
 CA19.9, ≤ 35 vs. > 35 ng/ml 2.474 1.664–3.677 0.000
 TNM stage, I + II vs. III 2.839 2.893–2.024 0.000
 Pathological grades, G1 + G2 vs. G3 1.68 1.128–2.503 0.011
 Age, > 60 ≤ 60 ys. 1.666 1.171–2.370 0.005
 Sex, F. vs. M. 0.675 0.463–0.982 0.04
B. R-CC
 TNM stage, I + II vs. III 3.139 1.30–7.582 0.011
C. L-CC
 TNM stage, I + II vs. III 4.168 1.980–8.852 0.000
D. RC
 STK1p, ≤ 0.9 vs. > 0.9 pM 1.777 1.094–2.753 0.031
 CEA, ≤ 5 vs. > 5 ng/ml 2.716 1.796–4.382 0.000
 CA19.9, ≤ 35 vs. > 35 ng/ml 2.119 1.293–3.472 0.003
 TNM stage, I + II vs. III 2.716 1.796–4.382 0.000

Black bold: P-values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant