Table 4.
Males (n = 11,314) |
Females (n = 14,596) |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adjusted1 OR (95 % CI) | P-value2 | Adjusted1 OR (95 % CI) | P-value2 | |
Low school enjoyment | ||||
Alcohol consumption | 0.16 | 0.0001 | ||
Never drinks | 1.00 (0.80–1.24) | 1.22 (1.02–1.46) | ||
Occasionally drinks | 1.10 (0.89–1.35) | 1.16 (0.98–1.37) | ||
1–7 units | 1 (ref) | 1 (ref) | ||
8–14 units | 0.85 (0.73–1.00) | 0.91 (0.81–1.02) | ||
15–21 units | 0.96 (0.81–1.13) | 1.07 (0.93–1.22) | ||
22 units or more | 1.03 (0.88–1.21) | 1.31 (1.11–1.54) | ||
Low social inclusion in school | ||||
Alcohol consumption | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | ||
Never drinks | 3.06 (2.57–3.65) | 3.39 (2.90–3.95) | ||
Occasionally drinks | 2.02 (1.71–2.40) | 2.18 (1.90–2.50) | ||
1–7 units | 1 (ref) | 1 (ref) | ||
8–14 units | 0.49 (0.42–0.57) | 0.53 (0.48–0.59) | ||
15–21 units | 0.36 (0.30–0.43) | 0.49 (0.43–0.56) | ||
22 units or more | 0.35 (0.29–0.41) | 0.57 (0.48–0.67) |
Multilevel logistic regression analysis with school as cluster level. Adjusted for age, education, geographical region, migration background, and parentś highest achieved education.
A Wald test was conducted to assess the hypothesis of no overall difference by categories of weekly alcohol consumption.