Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 13;128(2):234–241. doi: 10.1007/s11547-023-01589-7

Table 2.

Qualitative ratings of all reader regarding morphological features of the cervical spine

UTE FRACTURE CT
Reader 1 Reader 2 Reader 1 Reader 2 Reader 1 Reader 2
Upper part
Productive score 2.4 (1.2) 1.4 (1.8) 2.9 (0.8) 1.9 (2.1) 2.7 (1.7) 2.0 (2.3)
Joint degeneration 4.2 (1.0) 5.9 (2.7) 5.1 (1.5) 6.1 (2.6) 5.0 (1.9) 5.6 (3.2)
Spinal canal stenosis 0.3 (0.7) 0.6 (0.8) 1.0 (1.4) 0.4 (1.1) 0.6 (1.3) 0.4 (1.0)
Middle part
Productive score 4.2 (1.4) 3.6 (2.1) 4.0 (1.3) 4.0 (2.5) 4.0 (1.8) 4.1 (2.3)
Joint degeneration 4.7 (1.6) 6.7 (1.7) 6.6 (2.2) 6.7 (2.6) 6.1 (2.5) 6.2 (2.8)
Spinal canal stenosis 0.8 (1.3) 1.0 (1.1) 1.3 (1.4) 0.6 (1.0) 0.9 (1.2) 0.7 (0.9)
Lower part
Productive score 3.2 (1.2) 2.5 (2.2) 3.7 (1.0) 3.0 (2.5) 3.2 (1.5) 3.0 (2.3)
Joint degeneration 4.2 (1.1) 5.6 (2.2) 6.1 (2.0) 5.7 (2.8) 5.1 (2.2) 5.2 (2.3)
Spinal canal stenosis 0.4 (0.7) 0.5 (0.8) 0.6 (0.6) 0.3 (0.8) 0.5 (0.8) 0.3 (0.7)

Mean and standard deviation in parenthesis of morphological features are shown for both readers in detail in relation to the upper, middle and lower part of the cervical spine. The maximum points for the productive score are 9 points (0 none, < 3 mild, 3–6 moderate, > 6 severe), for the joint degeneration score 12 points (0 none, < 4 mild, 4–8 moderate, > 8 severe) and for the spinal canal stenosis score 6 points (0 none, < 2 mild, 2–4 moderate, > 4 severe)